+1 for ManageableContext
Personally I would still have UnmanagedContext, but since that seems ambiguous (as does
ManagedContext),
I chose ManageableContext.
Matej
----- Original Message -----
From: "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com>
To: cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 2:50:23 AM
Subject: [cdi-dev] [VOTE] Name the class that can start/stop contexts
All,
It seems like one of the remaining issues with CDI-30 is the name for the
class for the context management. This name isn't permanent, we can change
after EDR2, but not after final.
Here's the proposed renames for "UnmanagedContext":
- ManagedContext
- ManageableContext
- ProgrammaticContext
- ExternallyManagedContext
- UserManagedContext
Please respond back with your vote, I'll leave this open for 3 days ( I
believe its Monday morning in central Europe), so I'll close it Thursday
morning.
Reference:
http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/cdi-dev/2016/cdi-de...
- John
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code
under the Apache License, Version 2
(
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
property rights inherent in such information.