Re: [cdi-dev] [Vote] @Priority value order on ordered events

+0 Don't really care. Since it's not unified across CDI, having it one way or the other doesn't really make difference to me. Matej ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Antoine Sabot-Durand" <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net&gt; > To: "CDI Java EE Specification" <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2016 11:29:11 AM > Subject: [cdi-dev] [Vote] @Priority value order on ordered events > > Hi all, > > As already explained in a previous mail [1], some of us would like change the > current order of events to make the highest @Priority value first and the > lowest last. This change would be an alinement on how @Alternative work > (highest value being the first candidate). > > If you agree to the change (highest to lowest) vote +1, if you disagree -1 > and don't care 0. If you want to discuss thread is always open on [1] but > time is running out. > > Vote will end Monday at 12:00 pm CET. > > Thanks for your participation. > > Antoine > > [1] http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/2016-November/009330.html > > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code > under the Apache License, Version 2 > (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas > provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual > property rights inherent in such information. _______________________________________________ cdi-dev mailing list cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/ licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.