Yes, but why? This is not normal for a mailing list... On 27 Apr 2011, at 13:08, Mark Struberg wrote: > btw, can the mailing daemon be configured to automatically contain the list as mail-to? :) > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- On Wed, 4/27/11, Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de&gt; wrote: > >> From: Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de&gt; >> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI 1.1 >> To: "Peter Muir" <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; >> Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 12:06 PM >> is fine with me. >> >> I just found it a good idea to encourage people to use the >> voting feature of jira. People are not using it often since >> it is most times ignored. If the votes actually have a real >> impact, then people will use it more often - which would in >> turn provide a good feedback for the EG. >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> --- On Wed, 4/27/11, Peter Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> From: Peter Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; >>> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI 1.1 >>> To: "Mark Struberg" <struberg(a)yahoo.de&gt; >>> Cc: "cdi-dev" <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; >>> Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 12:01 PM >>> I see. We can consider doing >>> something like this - I guess what I have asked people >> to do >>> initially is equivalent to the feasibility check. We >> can >>> open it up to the community for after the kick off con >> call >>> and get their feedback on whether we are going in the >> right >>> direction. How does that sound? >>> >>> On 27 Apr 2011, at 12:57, Mark Struberg wrote: >>> >>>> The EG and extended EG first worked through all >> the >>> Jira issues and did some documentation and >> feasibility >>> checks. Before finishing the spec he called for >> feedback in >>> the community basically asking them to vote for the >> jira >>> issues (directly in jira) they see as most important >> to get >>> fixed. >>>> >>>> >>>> http://weblogs.java.net/blog/edburns/archive/2011/04/25/vote-your-top-fiv... >>>> >>>> http://java.net/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?requestId=10523 >>>> >>>> Actually your own uidata issue comes out on top >> ;) >>>> >>>> LieGrue, >>>> strub >>>> >>>> --- On Wed, 4/27/11, Peter Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> From: Peter Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>>> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI 1.1 >>>>> To: "Mark Struberg" <struberg(a)yahoo.de&gt; >>>>> Cc: "cdi-dev" <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; >>>>> Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 11:49 AM >>>>> Can you briefly explain the system he >>>>> used? >>>>> >>>>> On 27 Apr 2011, at 12:47, Mark Struberg >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Congratulations Pete! >>>>>> >>>>>> What do you think about a public voting >> as Ed >>> did with >>>>> JSF-2.2? >>>>>> Could give some good feedback. >>>>>> >>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>> strub >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --- On Wed, 4/27/11, Peter Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> From: Peter Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>>>>> Subject: [cdi-dev] CDI 1.1 >>>>>>> To: "cdi-dev" <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; >>>>>>> Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011, >> 11:25 AM >>>>>>> Hi everyone >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Welcome to the CDI 1.1 expert group. >> I've >>> started >>>>> to >>>>>>> collect some resources at https://github.com/pmuir/cdi/wiki. Please take some >>>>>>> time to read through them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would like everyone to work their >> way >>> through >>>>> the various >>>>>>> lists of issues in JIRA https://github.com/pmuir/cdi/wiki/CDI-1.1-issues and >>>>> do >>>>>>> four things: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * If you are aware of an issue that >> is >>> not >>>>> recorded, please >>>>>>> create one >>>>>>> * If you think an issue on the TBC >> list >>> should be >>>>> addressed >>>>>>> in CDI 1.1 then please make a note >> of >>> this, and >>>>> prepare an >>>>>>> email to this list explaining why >> you >>> think the >>>>> issue should >>>>>>> be included. Please restrict yourself >> to >>> three >>>>> such issues. >>>>>>> * If you think an issue on the >> proposed >>> list >>>>> shouldn't be >>>>>>> addressed then please make a note of >> this, >>> and >>>>> prepare an >>>>>>> email to this list explaining why >> you >>> think the >>>>> issue >>>>>>> shouldn't be included. Please >> restrict >>> yourself to >>>>> three >>>>>>> such issues. >>>>>>> * Write a note to the list indicating >> what >>> issues >>>>> you are >>>>>>> going to take a lead on. For major >> issues, >>> prepare >>>>> a 2 >>>>>>> minute summary for the concall so >> that you >>> can >>>>> brief people >>>>>>> on the issue. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The (soft) deadline for this exercise >> is >>> Wednesday >>>>> 11th >>>>>>> May. Of course, we can continue to >> debate >>> the >>>>> merits of >>>>>>> issues after this, but to make things >> run >>> smoothly >>>>> it will >>>>>>> help a lot if we can get this done >>> quickly! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I propose we have conference call on >>> Thursday 12th >>>>> May to >>>>>>> kick off, overview the main issues >> facing >>> us and >>>>> run through >>>>>>> who will take what issues. Here is >> my >>> proposed >>>>> slot - http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=CDI+Kick+off+con... >>>>>>> - it's difficult to find something >>> suitable for >>>>> everyone, >>>>>>> but this does allow both people in >>> Australia (late >>>>> night) >>>>>>> and the US West Coast (our two >> extremes) >>> to >>>>> particpate. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any comments or suggestions welcome, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Pete >>>>>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> cdi-dev mailing list >>>>>>> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev _______________________________________________ cdi-dev mailing list cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev