Ok, put it on standby and changing the minutes accordingly
Le mer. 6 avr. 2016 à 10:09, Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com> a écrit :
I disagree to merge the current version of cdi/pull/272.
1. The current wording is not clear.
Esp. the part: "the transaction is in an illegal state".
I understand that it should mean an IllegalStateException is thrown
during Transaction.registerSynchronization() but I think we should
rather follow the javadoc of this method.
See also https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/272#discussion_r58493520
2. Observer ordering
It might be useful to simulate the observer ordering as if the callback
was sucessfully registered, e.g. BEFORE_COMPLETION notified before
AFTER_COMPLETION and AFTER_FAILURE.
See also https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/272#issuecomment-206161278
and ongoing discussion.
Dne 6.4.2016 v 09:32 Antoine Sabot-Durand napsal(a):
> You'll find the minutes here:
> cdi-dev mailing list
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
). For all other ideas
provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
Red Hat, Czech Republic