4:18 a.m.
Joseph, Norman, Mathieu, George, Richard, Werner, Jerome, Antoine, Mark, Siva,
We would like to move JSR-346 to the new process defined by JSR-348.
The JCP PMO have raised two points:
1) A unanimous yes vote from the EG members listed on the JCP page
http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/summary?id=346 makes it clearer we can move.
2) The JSR submission makes note of a private alias for EG members. We've not used
that at any point, so we would also like a clear vote from you to remove that private
alias.
Finally, I've clarified the feedback process at
https://github.com/jboss/cdi/wiki#wiki-feedback - you might want to subscribe to
cdi-feedback. I will forward anything relevant to cdi-dev anyway.
Pete
4:19 a.m.
+1
2011/12/7 Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
Joseph, Norman, Mathieu, George, Richard, Werner, Jerome, Antoine,
Mark,
Siva,
We would like to move JSR-346 to the new process defined by JSR-348.
The JCP PMO have raised two points:
1) A unanimous yes vote from the EG members listed on the JCP page
http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/summary?id=346 makes it clearer we can move.
2) The JSR submission makes note of a private alias for EG members. We've
not used that at any point, so we would also like a clear vote from you to
remove that private alias.
Finally, I've clarified the feedback process at
https://github.com/jboss/cdi/wiki#wiki-feedback - you might want to
subscribe to cdi-feedback. I will forward anything relevant to cdi-dev
anyway.
Pete
--
*Rick Hightower*
(415) 968-9037
Profile <http://www.google.com/profiles/RichardHightower>
4:53 a.m.
Sounds good to me. Being also 348 EG member I approve and appreciate the
move.
Thanks,
Werner
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:18:03 +0000
Von: Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
An: Joseph Bergmark <bergmark(a)us.ibm.com>, norman.erck(a)holisticon.de,
mathieu.ancelin(a)gmail.com, George Gastaldi <gegastaldi(a)gmail.com>,
Richard Hightower <richardhightower(a)gmail.com>, Werner Keil
<werner.keil(a)gmx.net>, "Jérôme Petit" <jerome.petit(a)serli.com>,
Antoine
Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net>, Mark Struberg
<struberg(a)yahoo.de>, Sivakumar Thyagarajan
<sivakumar.thyagarajan(a)oracle.com>
CC: cdi-dev <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Betreff: Moving to JSR-348
Joseph, Norman, Mathieu, George, Richard, Werner, Jerome,
Antoine, Mark, Siva,
We would like to move JSR-346 to the new process defined by JSR-348.
The JCP PMO have raised two points:
1) A unanimous yes vote from the EG members listed on the JCP page
http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/summary?id=346 makes it clearer we can move.
2) The JSR submission makes note of a private alias for EG members. We've
not used that at any point, so we would also like a clear vote from you
to remove that private alias.
Finally, I've clarified the feedback process at
https://github.com/jboss/cdi/wiki#wiki-feedback - you might want to
subscribe to cdi-feedback. I will forward anything relevant to cdi-dev
anyway.
Pete
--
Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
5:20 a.m.
+1
Regards,
George Gastaldi
Em 07/12/2011, às 08:18, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> escreveu:
Joseph, Norman, Mathieu, George, Richard, Werner, Jerome, Antoine,
Mark, Siva,
We would like to move JSR-346 to the new process defined by JSR-348.
The JCP PMO have raised two points:
1) A unanimous yes vote from the EG members listed on the JCP page
http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/summary?id=346 makes it clearer we can move.
2) The JSR submission makes note of a private alias for EG members. We've not used
that at any point, so we would also like a clear vote from you to remove that private
alias.
Finally, I've clarified the feedback process at
https://github.com/jboss/cdi/wiki#wiki-feedback - you might want to subscribe to
cdi-feedback. I will forward anything relevant to cdi-dev anyway.
Pete
5:31 a.m.
+1 good move
Envoyé de mon iPhone
Le 7 déc. 2011 à 11:18, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> a écrit :
Joseph, Norman, Mathieu, George, Richard, Werner, Jerome, Antoine,
Mark, Siva,
We would like to move JSR-346 to the new process defined by JSR-348.
The JCP PMO have raised two points:
1) A unanimous yes vote from the EG members listed on the JCP page
http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/summary?id=346 makes it clearer we can move.
2) The JSR submission makes note of a private alias for EG members. We've not used
that at any point, so we would also like a clear vote from you to remove that private
alias.
Finally, I've clarified the feedback process at
https://github.com/jboss/cdi/wiki#wiki-feedback - you might want to subscribe to
cdi-feedback. I will forward anything relevant to cdi-dev anyway.
Pete
6:13 a.m.
+1
Jérôme PETIT
SERLI
+33 6 22 73 44 54
+33 5 49 49 49 42
Le 7 déc. 2011 11:18, "Pete Muir" <pmuir(a)redhat.com> a écrit :
Joseph, Norman, Mathieu, George, Richard, Werner, Jerome, Antoine,
Mark,
Siva,
We would like to move JSR-346 to the new process defined by JSR-348.
The JCP PMO have raised two points:
1) A unanimous yes vote from the EG members listed on the JCP page
http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/summary?id=346 makes it clearer we can move.
2) The JSR submission makes note of a private alias for EG members. We've
not used that at any point, so we would also like a clear vote from you to
remove that private alias.
Finally, I've clarified the feedback process at
https://github.com/jboss/cdi/wiki#wiki-feedback - you might want to
subscribe to cdi-feedback. I will forward anything relevant to cdi-dev
anyway.
Pete
6:48 a.m.
+1
2011/12/7 Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
Joseph, Norman, Mathieu, George, Richard, Werner, Jerome, Antoine,
Mark,
Siva,
We would like to move JSR-346 to the new process defined by JSR-348.
The JCP PMO have raised two points:
1) A unanimous yes vote from the EG members listed on the JCP page
http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/summary?id=346 makes it clearer we can move.
2) The JSR submission makes note of a private alias for EG members. We've
not used that at any point, so we would also like a clear vote from you to
remove that private alias.
Finally, I've clarified the feedback process at
https://github.com/jboss/cdi/wiki#wiki-feedback - you might want to
subscribe to cdi-feedback. I will forward anything relevant to cdi-dev
anyway.
Pete
--
Regards.
Mathieu ANCELIN
9:16 a.m.
+1
(we already voted on this, didn't we?)
LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message -----
From: Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
To: Joseph Bergmark <bergmark(a)us.ibm.com>; norman.erck(a)holisticon.de;
mathieu.ancelin(a)gmail.com; George Gastaldi <gegastaldi(a)gmail.com>; Richard Hightower
<richardhightower(a)gmail.com>; Werner Keil <werner.keil(a)gmx.net>; Jérôme Petit
<jerome.petit(a)serli.com>; Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net>;
Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de>; Sivakumar Thyagarajan
<sivakumar.thyagarajan(a)oracle.com>
Cc: cdi-dev <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2011 11:18 AM
Subject: Moving to JSR-348
Joseph, Norman, Mathieu, George, Richard, Werner, Jerome, Antoine, Mark, Siva,
We would like to move JSR-346 to the new process defined by JSR-348.
The JCP PMO have raised two points:
1) A unanimous yes vote from the EG members listed on the JCP page
http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/summary?id=346 makes it clearer we can move.
2) The JSR submission makes note of a private alias for EG members. We've
not used that at any point, so we would also like a clear vote from you to
remove that private alias.
Finally, I've clarified the feedback process at
https://github.com/jboss/cdi/wiki#wiki-feedback - you might want to subscribe to
cdi-feedback. I will forward anything relevant to cdi-dev anyway.
Pete
9:17 a.m.
Yes, but the PMO told me I needed a unanimous vote I think ;-)
Sorry for the extra work!
On 7 Dec 2011, at 15:16, Mark Struberg wrote:
+1
(we already voted on this, didn't we?)
LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message -----
> From: Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
> To: Joseph Bergmark <bergmark(a)us.ibm.com>; norman.erck(a)holisticon.de;
mathieu.ancelin(a)gmail.com; George Gastaldi <gegastaldi(a)gmail.com>; Richard Hightower
<richardhightower(a)gmail.com>; Werner Keil <werner.keil(a)gmx.net>; Jérôme Petit
<jerome.petit(a)serli.com>; Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net>;
Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de>; Sivakumar Thyagarajan
<sivakumar.thyagarajan(a)oracle.com>
> Cc: cdi-dev <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2011 11:18 AM
> Subject: Moving to JSR-348
>
> Joseph, Norman, Mathieu, George, Richard, Werner, Jerome, Antoine, Mark, Siva,
>
> We would like to move JSR-346 to the new process defined by JSR-348.
>
> The JCP PMO have raised two points:
>
> 1) A unanimous yes vote from the EG members listed on the JCP page
> http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/summary?id=346 makes it clearer we can move.
> 2) The JSR submission makes note of a private alias for EG members. We've
> not used that at any point, so we would also like a clear vote from you to
> remove that private alias.
>
> Finally, I've clarified the feedback process at
> https://github.com/jboss/cdi/wiki#wiki-feedback - you might want to subscribe to
> cdi-feedback. I will forward anything relevant to cdi-dev anyway.
>
> Pete
>
3:10 p.m.
+1 for both points.
kr
fabien
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Yes, but the PMO told me I needed a unanimous vote I think ;-)
Sorry for the extra work!
On 7 Dec 2011, at 15:16, Mark Struberg wrote:
> +1
>
> (we already voted on this, didn't we?)
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
>> To: Joseph Bergmark <bergmark(a)us.ibm.com>; norman.erck(a)holisticon.de;
mathieu.ancelin(a)gmail.com; George Gastaldi <gegastaldi(a)gmail.com>;
Richard Hightower <richardhightower(a)gmail.com>; Werner Keil <
werner.keil(a)gmx.net>; Jérôme Petit <jerome.petit(a)serli.com>; Antoine
Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net>; Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de>;
Sivakumar Thyagarajan <sivakumar.thyagarajan(a)oracle.com>
>> Cc: cdi-dev <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2011 11:18 AM
>> Subject: Moving to JSR-348
>>
>> Joseph, Norman, Mathieu, George, Richard, Werner, Jerome, Antoine,
Mark, Siva,
>>
>> We would like to move JSR-346 to the new process defined by JSR-348.
>>
>> The JCP PMO have raised two points:
>>
>> 1) A unanimous yes vote from the EG members listed on the JCP page
>> http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/summary?id=346 makes it clearer we can move.
>> 2) The JSR submission makes note of a private alias for EG members.
We've
>> not used that at any point, so we would also like a clear vote from you
to
>> remove that private alias.
>>
>> Finally, I've clarified the feedback process at
>> https://github.com/jboss/cdi/wiki#wiki-feedback - you might want to
subscribe to
>> cdi-feedback. I will forward anything relevant to cdi-dev anyway.
>>
>> Pete
>>
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
--
http://www.suntriprecords.com
9:19 a.m.
1) I'm in favor of moving to JSR348, as it seems we are already operating
in that manner (open list, JIRA to track issues, etc). I apologize for not
official voting on this when you brought it up earlier.
2) I have no concerns regarding removing the private alias.
In summary +1 to both.
Sincerely,
Joe Bergmark
WebSphere Development
bergmark(a)us.ibm.com
|------------>
| From: |
|------------>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| To: |
|------------>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Joseph Bergmark/Durham/IBM@IBMUS, norman.erck(a)holisticon.de,
mathieu.ancelin(a)gmail.com, George Gastaldi <gegastaldi(a)gmail.com>, Richard Hightower
|
|<richardhightower(a)gmail.com>, Werner Keil <werner.keil(a)gmx.net>, Jérôme
Petit <jerome.petit(a)serli.com>, Antoine Sabot-Durand |
|<antoine(a)sabot-durand.net>, Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de>, Sivakumar
Thyagarajan <sivakumar.thyagarajan(a)oracle.com> |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Cc: |
|------------>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|cdi-dev <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Date: |
|------------>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|12/07/2011 05:18 AM
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Subject: |
|------------>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Moving to JSR-348
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Joseph, Norman, Mathieu, George, Richard, Werner, Jerome, Antoine, Mark,
Siva,
We would like to move JSR-346 to the new process defined by JSR-348.
The JCP PMO have raised two points:
1) A unanimous yes vote from the EG members listed on the JCP page
http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/summary?id=346 makes it clearer we can move.
2) The JSR submission makes note of a private alias for EG members. We've
not used that at any point, so we would also like a clear vote from you to
remove that private alias.
Finally, I've clarified the feedback process at
https://github.com/jboss/cdi/wiki#wiki-feedback - you might want to
subscribe to cdi-feedback. I will forward anything relevant to cdi-dev
anyway.
Pete
11:38 p.m.
Hi Pete
On Wednesday 07 December 2011 03:48 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
Joseph, Norman, Mathieu, George, Richard, Werner, Jerome, Antoine,
Mark, Siva,
We would like to move JSR-346 to the new process defined by JSR-348.
The JCP PMO have raised two points:
1) A unanimous yes vote from the EG members listed on the JCP page
http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/summary?id=346 makes it clearer we can move.
2) The JSR submission makes note of a private alias for EG members. We've not used
that at any point, so we would also like a clear vote from you to remove that private
alias.
+1 for both of these.
Thanks
--Siva.
Finally, I've clarified the feedback process at
https://github.com/jboss/cdi/wiki#wiki-feedback - you might want to subscribe to
cdi-feedback. I will forward anything relevant to cdi-dev anyway.
Pete
3:36 a.m.
Hi Pete,
+1.
Best regards.
Norman
Am 08.12.11 06:38 schrieb "Sivakumar Thyagarajan" unter
<sivakumar.thyagarajan(a)oracle.com>:
Hi Pete
On Wednesday 07 December 2011 03:48 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
> Joseph, Norman, Mathieu, George, Richard, Werner, Jerome, Antoine,
>Mark, Siva,
>
> We would like to move JSR-346 to the new process defined by JSR-348.
>
> The JCP PMO have raised two points:
>
> 1) A unanimous yes vote from the EG members listed on the JCP page
>http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/summary?id=346 makes it clearer we can move.
> 2) The JSR submission makes note of a private alias for EG members.
>We've not used that at any point, so we would also like a clear vote
>from you to remove that private alias.
+1 for both of these.
Thanks
--Siva.
>
> Finally, I've clarified the feedback process at
>https://github.com/jboss/cdi/wiki#wiki-feedback - you might want to
>subscribe to cdi-feedback. I will forward anything relevant to cdi-dev
>anyway.
>
> Pete
3:38 a.m.
Many thanks to everyone! I'll inform the PMO we are ready to move.
On 8 Dec 2011, at 09:36, Norman Erck wrote:
Hi Pete,
+1.
Best regards.
Norman
Am 08.12.11 06:38 schrieb "Sivakumar Thyagarajan" unter
<sivakumar.thyagarajan(a)oracle.com>:
> Hi Pete
>
> On Wednesday 07 December 2011 03:48 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
>> Joseph, Norman, Mathieu, George, Richard, Werner, Jerome, Antoine,
>> Mark, Siva,
>>
>> We would like to move JSR-346 to the new process defined by JSR-348.
>>
>> The JCP PMO have raised two points:
>>
>> 1) A unanimous yes vote from the EG members listed on the JCP page
>> http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/summary?id=346 makes it clearer we can move.
>> 2) The JSR submission makes note of a private alias for EG members.
>> We've not used that at any point, so we would also like a clear vote
>> from you to remove that private alias.
>
> +1 for both of these.
>
> Thanks
> --Siva.
>
>>
>> Finally, I've clarified the feedback process at
>> https://github.com/jboss/cdi/wiki#wiki-feedback - you might want to
>> subscribe to cdi-feedback. I will forward anything relevant to cdi-dev
>> anyway.
>>
>> Pete
>
5126
days inactive
5127
days old
13 comments
12 participants
participants (12)
-
Antoine Sabot-Durand -
Fabien Marsaud -
George Gastaldi -
Joseph Bergmark -
Jérôme Petit -
Mark Struberg -
Mathieu ANCELIN -
Norman Erck -
Pete Muir -
Rick Hightower -
Sivakumar Thyagarajan -
Werner Keil