Replies inline.
On Friday 09 March 2012 08:37 PM, Wolf-Dieter Fink wrote:
But with BMT-SLSB.
If I start the Tx at client and call a method the following code
return with FALSE:
{code}
@Stateless
@TransactionManagement(TransactionManagementType.BEAN)
public class BMTStatelessSessionBean implements BMTStatelessSession {
private static final Logger LOGGER =
LoggerFactory.getLogger(BMTStatelessSessionBean.class);
@Resource
UserTransaction uTx;
@Override
public boolean checkTransaction() {
try {
if(uTx.getStatus() == Status.STATUS_ACTIVE) {
return true;
}
LOGGER.error("Transaction is not Active as expected! State
{}",uTx.getStatus());
} catch (SystemException e) {
LOGGER.error("Could not check Transaction!",e);
}
return false;
}
{code}
Am I wrong? If I remember correct from my examples this should work in
AS5.
Or is it a bug?
The EJB 3.1 spec section 13.6.1 says this for BMT:
<quote>
The container must manage client invocations to an enterprise bean
instance with bean-managed transaction demarcation as follows. When a
client invokes a business method via one of the enterprise bean’s client
views, the container suspends any transaction that may be associated
with the client request...
</quote>
That section has much more details about how this is handled for SFSB
and SLSB.
@Jaikiran - might be a question for you
What about loadbalancing EJB calls? If I remember rightly this was
planned for 7.1.1.
Load balancing is available for @Clustered beans as well as
non-clustered beans/servers. For @Clustered beans the load balancing can
be configured by setting the
remote.cluster.<cluster-name>.clusternodeselector property to point to
an implementation of the org.jboss.ejb.client.ClusterNodeSelector
interface. Or programatically, you set it on the
org.jboss.ejb.client.ClusterContext yourself.
For non-clustered beans, if multiple server instances/receivers within a
client context can serve the same deployment, then we use an
implementation of org.jboss.ejb.client.DeploymentNodeSelector to let
that selector decide the node. Currently this isn't configurable, but
will be in 1.1.x of ejb-client API. For 1.0.x the demand was to just
make sure that the invocation doesn't always end up on the same node.
P.S: I don't have the code open right now, so some of the property
names/class names might not be completely accurate.
-Jaikiran