Only as an example. If someone actually looked up the mail session in
JNDI it wouldn't work unless there was an smtp server on localhost:25.
Previous (< AS 7) releases had a more obviously "example" config, e.g.
<!-- Change to the SMTP gateway server -->
<property name="mail.smtp.host"
value="smtp.nosuchhost.nosuchdomain.com"/>
I'm not sure if we need/want an example mail session in our standard config.
On 11/28/11 7:12 AM, Heiko Braun wrote:
Does this make sense?
*remote-destination... -> localhost?*
[standalone@localhost:9999 /]
/socket-binding-group=standard-sockets/remote-destination-outbound-socket-binding=mail-smtp:read-resource
{
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => {
"fixed-source-port" => false,
"host" => "localhost",
"port" => 25
}
}
*
*
In general, why do we have "remote-destination-outbound-socket-binding"
and "local-destination-outbound-socket-binding"?
Seems pretty awkward to me. Both the name and the separation.
Why not:
outbound-socket-binding {type=<local/remote>} ?
Ike
_______________________________________________
jboss-as7-dev mailing list
jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
--
Brian Stansberry
Principal Software Engineer
JBoss by Red Hat