Go ahead, thanks. The discussion of whether to try and write an old
schema version doesn't mean we can't change the default.
On 9/23/11 9:30 AM, Darran Lofthouse wrote:
Anyone mind if I make these changes? My next changes are dependent
on
being on the next version of the schema.
Regards,
Darran Lofthouse.
On 09/23/2011 03:03 PM, Brian Stansberry wrote:
> We should shift the 1.1 as the default and the marshallers should write
> the latest.
>
> On 9/23/11 8:57 AM, Darran Lofthouse wrote:
>> Also one more question.
>>
>> Which version should the server now be writing when the configuration is
>> persisted?
>>
>> Do we have a policy for everything to write using the latest schema
>> version or are we going to be trying to use the version specified until
>> new elements/attributes are encountered?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Darran Lofthouse.
>>
>>
>> On 09/23/2011 02:33 PM, Darran Lofthouse wrote:
>>> Now that 7.0.2 is out and the only subsequent planned releases are for
>>> 7.1 can we switch the namespace for all default configuration to
>>> 'urn:jboss:domain:1.1'?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Darran Lofthouse.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>>> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
jboss-as7-dev mailing list
jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
--
Brian Stansberry
Principal Software Engineer
JBoss by Red Hat