Part of the problem is this issue that we just discovered:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4092, where empty transactions cannot be committed or
rolled back.
I am just testing a fix now.
Stuart
On 08/03/2012, at 5:54 AM, Wolf-Dieter Fink wrote:
===== Regarding node-name. =====
In standalone I supposed it is the name of jboss-ejb-client.properties
remote.connection.default.host=localhost
But I have to set it by -Djboss.node.name=<>.
??? it is not possible to add a system-property to the standalone.xml for that, or do I
something wrong with the system-property element in configuration???
??? What is the name in domain mode? Is the <server name="" ...>
attribute for each defined server used???
??? Is it possible to see the node name with the management console???
The section for remote invoking EJB's note that a node name must be set unique, but I
did not see any problem if I start two instances (same machine) without jboss.node.name?
Is here a default created?
==== UserTransaction =====
If I do this in my client:
{code}
1: UserTransaction uTx = EJBClient.getUserTransaction("Wolf");
2: LOG.debug("UserTransaction ="+uTx);
3: uTx.begin();
4: LOG.debug("Tx.begin() ok");
5: bmtSession.checkTransaction(); // call a SLSB to use Tx
6: uTx.commit();
LOG.debug("Tx.commit() ok");
{code}
Line 1 and 3 works nevertheless whether there is a server (with or without a correct
node.name) or not. The line 5: will fail 'No EJB receiver with 'node.name'
If I remove getUserTransaction I can execute the code nevertheless whether a node name is
set or not.
??? So I suppose the getUTx will attach the next EJB call to that server ???
If a server is available the commit will fail (also the EJB checkTransaction show the
TxState=6 (NO-Tx)
java.lang.IllegalStateException: BaseTransaction.commit - ARJUNA016074: no transaction!
at
com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.transaction.arjunacore.BaseTransaction.commit(BaseTransaction.java:113)
at
com.arjuna.ats.jbossatx.BaseTransactionManagerDelegate.commit(BaseTransactionManagerDelegate.java:75)
at
org.jboss.as.ejb3.remote.protocol.versionone.UserTransactionCommitTask.manageTransaction(UserTransactionCommitTask.java:47)
at
org.jboss.as.ejb3.remote.protocol.versionone.UserTransactionManagementTask.run(UserTransactionManagementTask.java:64)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
at org.jboss.threads.JBossThread.run(JBossThread.java:122)
??? My question what is wrong with my assumption or code???
- Wolf
On 03/06/2012 06:28 PM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
>
> On 03/06/2012 11:17 AM, Wolf-Dieter Fink wrote:
>> Is it possible to lookup and use UserTransaction from a remote-client as
>> in AS5?
>> Or is it planned for further release?
> In AS 7, you can have a connection to more than one server at once.
> Thus you have to specify which server node you want to talk to. The
> method you want is
> org.jboss.ejb.client.EJBClient#getUserTransaction(String), where the
> argument is the node name. Note that your connection must already be
> established at this point.
>
> We do not presently have a way to pull a UserTransaction out of JNDI,
> though that could be considered for an enhancement.
>
_______________________________________________
jboss-as7-dev mailing list
jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev