Re: [jboss-as7-dev] Another interface question

The reason why I am asking is, that we basically cannot verify constraints across domain.xml and host.xml. I.e. you could have domain.xml > <interface name="management"> > <nic name="eth0"/> > </interface> and host.xml > <interface name="management"> <not> > <nic name="eth0"/> </not> > </interface> That's something I cannot validate in the console. But to improve the situation we could add a resolveInterface() operation to the host level. Which might be used to verify the effective configuration before it's written to disk. Otherwise things blowup upon server bootstrap. Ike On Nov 23, 2011, at 6:50 PM, Brian Stansberry wrote: > A setting like this is logical in domain.xml, if the hosts in the domain > had a consistent configuration: > > <interfaces> > <interface name="management"> > <nic name="eth0"/> > </interface> > <interface name="public"> > <nic name="eth1"/> > </interface> > <interface name="loopback"> > <loopback/> > </interface> > <interface name="example"> > <subnet-match value="192.168.100.0/24"/> > </interface> > </interfaces> > > On 11/23/11 7:28 AM, Heiko Braun wrote: >> >> >> Should the top level interface configuration be disabled in domain mode? >> Opposed to editing the interface son the host level? >> >> >> Ike >> _______________________________________________ >> jboss-as7-dev mailing list >> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev > > > -- > Brian Stansberry > Principal Software Engineer > JBoss by Red Hat > _______________________________________________ > jboss-as7-dev mailing list > jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev