On 9/24/2012 12:18 PM, Jason Greene wrote:
There are two solutions to this problem.
1) Switch the interaction to use plugable constructs (common SPI (interfaces &
superclasses), dynamically loaded implementation which depends on the common SPI)
Unfortunately, we don't control that part. It's defined by the JSF impl.
2) Dynamically generate a module with an extra resource root to the same jar
That's what I wanted to do, but David says dynamic generation of modules
is not possible given our performance constraints.
The only other thing I can think of is to have a tool that installs and
configures the modules for you. Then the user or admin wouldn't have to
do it by hand. But such a tool would get rather complex in a domain
configuration.
On Sep 24, 2012, at 10:29 AM, ssilvert(a)redhat.com wrote:
> OK. Thanks.
>
> This is alright for now because we only have two JSF impls. But we want
> to allow users to install additional impls. So it's a little ugly to
> tell them that they have to make another copy of the jsf-injection
> module for each one.
>
>
> On 9/24/2012 9:47 AM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
>> On 09/24/2012 07:49 AM, ssilvert(a)redhat.com wrote:
>>> On 9/24/2012 8:15 AM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
>>>> Unfortunately this premise is flawed from the start: if you had two
>>>> apps, each requiring a different JSF implementation, this idea could
>>>> never work.
>>> I'm not sure what you mean here. This is already working.
>>>> In any case you cannot change the dependencies of a static module at
>>>> runtime. Normally when multiple implementations are available you would
>>>> use reflection to instantiate the implementation you need. If this is
>>>> not possible then you'll need a separate module for each
implementation
>>>> type.
>>> That's the problem. It's not that I need to instantiate something.
>>> Rather, I need to put jsf-injection in a position where the JSF impl
>>> will find my service and instantiate it. So the way things are now I
>>> have to statically define a new jsf-injection module for each JSF impl.
>>> Those modules are exactly the same except for one dependency declaration.
>> If JSF is instantiating your module via SPI or similar then yes, you
>> will need to clone your classes for each implementation because you're
>> statically linking to the Mojarra API (meaning at run time your modules
>> are no longer exactly the same as classes have different supertypes and
>> so on).
>>
>>> If I could programatically define the module then I wouldn't have to
>>> repeat myself.
>>>
>>> Maybe JBoss Modules was never meant to be used that way?
>> If every Mojarra implementation is statically defined as a module, then
>> you will have to create separate static modules for each one. If you're
>> loading them in from a deployment then you should use the deployers' API
>> for defining module dependencies to automatically tack on a copy of your
>> integration classes.
>>
>> The reason this is so is that in order to have the very fast startup we
>> have today, the initial module loader runs in a purely static environment.
>>
>>>> On 09/24/2012 07:06 AM, ssilvert(a)redhat.com wrote:
>>>>> I have a module defined like this (currently in master with main and
>>>>> slot="1.2):
>>>>> <module xmlns="urn:jboss:module:1.1"
name="org.jboss.as.jsf-injection">
>>>>> <resources>
>>>>> <resource-root
>>>>>
path="jboss-as-jsf-injection-7.2.0.Alpha1-SNAPSHOT.jar"/>
>>>>> </resources>
>>>>>
>>>>> <dependencies>
>>>>> <module name="com.sun.jsf-impl"/>
<----- this needs to be dynamic
>>>>> <module name="javax.api"/>
>>>>> <module name="org.jboss.as.web"/>
>>>>> <module name="javax.servlet.api"/>
>>>>> </dependencies>
>>>>> </module>
>>>>>
>>>>> Inside a DeploymentUnitProcessor, the module above is added to the
>>>>> ModuleSpecification along with the module for the selected JSF
>>>>> implementation. The problem I have is that the JSF Injection code
is
>>>>> the same for any Mojarra implementation. But to support multiple
>>>>> implementations I need to declare a separate jsf-injection module
with a
>>>>> hard-coded dependency on each implementation installed.
>>>>>
>>>>> If I could create a module dynamically and dynamically add its
>>>>> dependencies then there would be no need to create more and more
modules
>>>>> containing the same jsf-injection jar.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been looking at the JBoss Modules API and I don't see
how to do
>>>>> this. Is it possible?
>>>>>
>>>>> Stan
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>>>>> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>>> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev