Re: [jboss-as7-dev] JBOSGI docs

Capabilities refer to bundles or modules available in the AS 7

I've added some content here: http://docs.jboss.org/author/display/JBOSGI/Command+Line+Interface+Console and here: http://docs.jboss.org/author/display/JBOSGI/Management+Console I also updated http://docs.jboss.org/author/display/JBOSGI/Getting+Started to explain the difference between the AS7 and project distribution and updated the bundle deployment section in there. I made some minor changes to http://docs.jboss.org/author/display/JBOSGI/Application+Server+Integration Cheers, David On 15/05/2012 09:28, Thomas Diesler wrote: > Hi David > > On 05/15/2012 08:41 AM, David Bosschaert wrote: >> Hi Thomas, >> >> I made the OSGi subsystem section in AS7 point to JBOSGI >> documentation wiki as it contained pretty much all of the >> documentation needed. >> >> I had a look at the JBOSGI docs at >> https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/JBOSGI/JBoss+OSGi+Home and had >> a few thoughts, just thought I'd run them by you before changing >> anything... >> >> * The Getting Started page focuses on the JBOSGi installer and >> obtaining JBoss OSGi that way. I think it should focus on pure AS7 >> where it mention that the AS7 installer can be used to obtain extra >> functionality, but I think people should realize that no additional >> download is needed to obtain JBoss OSGI... > We expect to have a faster release cycle than AS7. In future the > jbosgi installer can be used to update the osgi components in a given > AS7 community release. We would update our binaries but not any of > the AS/integration code. The jbosgi examples demonstrate/document the > scope of supported functionality, which is the second aspect of an > jbosgi release. The third is a snapshot of documentation. >> >> * The bundle deployment section on the getting started page needs >> updating > yes >> >> * The CLI documentation needs to be added, do you agree that this >> can be added somewhere in the Application Server Integration section? > yes that'd be the right place. ConfigAdmin coverage is missing too. >> >> I am happy to make these changes but wanted to get your opinion >> first... > That'd be awesome. > > cheers >> >> Cheers, >> >> David >