You're right; thanks. And that means one less thing to change on the
wiki. :-)
On 1/28/11 11:54 AM, Kabir Khan wrote:
With the stuff discussed at [2] doesn't DESCRIPTORS become
superfluous? The idea being that complex sub-attribute (for want of a better word) types
live under VALUE_TYPE?
On 28 Jan 2011, at 17:34, Brian Stansberry wrote:
> We discussed your idea on IRC[1] and your proposal at [2] looks good.
> For this to work, we can't allow "Arbitrary Descriptors" as described
on
> [3] at the same level as "type", "required", "description,
"value-type".
> So the idea is we'd add a "descriptors" reserved word at the same
level
> as "type", "required" etc; any arbitary descriptors would need to
be
> nested under "descriptors", e.g.
>
> node.get(ATTRIBUTES, SIZE, DESCRIPTORS, MAX).set(20);
>
> [1]
http://echelog.matzon.dk/logs/browse/jboss-as7/1296169200 starting
> at 17:14:31
>
> [2]
http://pastebin.com/1X6qhcLf
>
> [3]
http://community.jboss.org/docs/DOC-16317
>
> On 1/28/11 5:28 AM, Kabir Khan wrote:
>> For jboss-as-threads I wrote pretty full model descriptors, however for values
such as
>>
>> <keepalive-time time="100" unit="ms"/>
>>
>> I split this into two attributes in the model
>>
>> node.get(ATTRIBUTES, KEEPALIVE_TIME_DURATION,
DESCRIPTION).set(bundle.getString("threadpool.common.keepaliveduration"));
>> node.get(ATTRIBUTES, KEEPALIVE_TIME_DURATION,
TYPE).set(ModelType.LONG);
>> node.get(ATTRIBUTES, KEEPALIVE_TIME_DURATION, REQUIRED).set(false);
>>
>> node.get(ATTRIBUTES, KEEPALIVE_TIME_UNIT,
DESCRIPTION).set(bundle.getString("threadpool.common.keepaliveunit"));
>> node.get(ATTRIBUTES, KEEPALIVE_TIME_UNIT, TYPE).set(ModelType.STRING);
>> node.get(ATTRIBUTES, KEEPALIVE_TIME_UNIT, REQUIRED).set(false);
>>
>> //threadpool.common.keepaliveduration=Used to specify the amount of time that
pool threads should be kept running when idle; if not specified, threads will run until
the executor is shut down.
>> //threadpool.common.keepaliveunit=The time unit for the number specified in
keepalive-time-duration.
>>
>>
>> Working on the marshalling I see Emanuel takes a different approch by passing in
simple sub-elements like this as a ModelNode which is more elegant. That is kind of what I
wanted to do but didn't really know how to write the description in a nice way. Since
there are not many descriptors yet I'd like to clarify the structure and find the best
practice. My original thought was that the structure would have to go in the node's
description attribute (ATTRIBUTES, KEEPALIVE_TIME, DESCRIPTION below), but it might be
nicer to do something like this:
>>
>> node.get(ATTRIBUTES, KEEPALIVE_TIME, DESCRIPTION).set("Used to
specify the amount of time that pool threads should be kept running when idle; if not
specified, threads will run until the executor is shut down"));
>> node.get(ATTRIBUTES, KEEPALIVE_TIME, TYPE).set(ModelType.OBJECT);
>> node.get(ATTRIBUTES, KEEPALIVE_TIME, REQUIRED).set(false);
>>
>> node.get(ATTRIBUTES, KEEPALIVE_TIME, TIME, DESCRIPTION).set("The
time"));
>> node.get(ATTRIBUTES, KEEPALIVE_TIME, TIME, TYPE).set(ModelType.LONG);
>> node.get(ATTRIBUTES, KEEPALIVE_TIME, TIME, REQUIRED).set(false);
>>
>>
>> node.get(ATTRIBUTES, KEEPALIVE_TIME, UNIT, DESCRIPTION).set("The
time unit (Seconds, Milliseconds etc.)"));
>> node.get(ATTRIBUTES, KEEPALIVE_TIME, UNIT, TYPE).set(ModelType.STRING);
>> node.get(ATTRIBUTES, KEEPALIVE_TIME, UNIT, REQUIRED).set(false);
>>
>> And if the keepalive-time attribute is optional but if present both time and unit
sub-attributes must be specified, I think we would go with something like
>>
>>
>> node.get(ATTRIBUTES, KEEPALIVE_TIME, REQUIRED).set(false);
>> node.get(ATTRIBUTES, KEEPALIVE_TIME, TIME, REQUIRED).set(true);
>> node.get(ATTRIBUTES, KEEPALIVE_TIME, UNIT, REQUIRED).set(true);
>>
>> If it is keepalive-time is required and unit is optional, how about
>>
>> node.get(ATTRIBUTES, KEEPALIVE_TIME, REQUIRED).set(true);
>> node.get(ATTRIBUTES, KEEPALIVE_TIME, TIME, REQUIRED).set(true);
>> node.get(ATTRIBUTES, KEEPALIVE_TIME, UNIT, REQUIRED).set(false);
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>
>
> --
> Brian Stansberry
> Principal Software Engineer
> JBoss by Red Hat
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev