Ok, stub extensions is the obvious alternative to breaking compatibility. I'll leave
this as a future task and create a jira for it if that's ok with you.
cheers
--thomas
On Feb 28, 2013, at 4:22 PM, David M. Lloyd <david.lloyd(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 02/28/2013 05:57 AM, Thomas Diesler wrote:
> Folks,
>
> related to
>
> * [AS7-6612 <
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-6612>] Remove JAXR support
>
> I'd like to know whether we need to preserve backward compatibility of
> the configuration and if so what should happen if there is a jaxr config
> item? Generally, can AS8 break backward compatibility with respect to
> the config?
Brian points out that we don't have a specific requirement to maintain
compatibility with obsolete subsystems. I think we could go ahead with
the removal (granted part of the reason I feel this way is that I've
already removed JSR-88...).
Going forward though Kabir suggested that if we do want to, say, allow
7.x instances to be managed from an 8.x DC, that we should create "stub"
extensions for the removed stuff that only carry and validate
configuration but aren't actually supported on 8.x servers. This seems
like a valid possibility to me.
--
- DML
_______________________________________________
jboss-as7-dev mailing list
jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thomas Diesler
JBoss OSGi Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx