So, I have to pop out of my IDE and run a maven build just to be able
to
run tests within my IDE? Yikes... Another reason why I just won't use
JBoss Logging...
On 6/8/12 2:37 PM, Jason T. Greene wrote:
> On 6/8/12 3:06 AM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>> That's the crux really. I always bitch when I have to add a log message with
JBoss logging compared to the good old log4j. But I would not meet the requirements.
>>
>> See it positively, it's annoying enough to add a log or throw an exception
that I do it less often and my code is even more efficient :D
>> The other annoying bit is when your log interface is in a common module and you
work on a dependent module. This requires full recompilation and I am often bitten by this
with method not found exceptions.
>
> We used to have a proxy mode feature for exactly this problem. You would
> set a sys prop and it would generate dynamic proxies implementing the
> the source code locales. This was quite a bit slower than the compile
> generated classes so it was intended to be develop mode only. The idea
> was that you just set it in your IDE settings and be done with it.
>
> It turns out it wasnt used very much, and it relied on runtime
> annotation retention, so it was killed. If enough people felt it was a
> problem though we could revisit that.
>
> What do you think?
>
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
_______________________________________________
jboss-as7-dev mailing list
jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev