----- Original Message -----
From: "Carlo de Wolf" <cdewolf(a)redhat.com>
To: jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2012 11:05:23 PM
Subject: Re: [jboss-as7-dev] What to do about jboss-common-core?
On 03/08/2012 04:18 PM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
On 03/08/2012 04:53 AM, Carlo de Wolf wrote:
> On 03/08/2012 08:33 AM, Bartosz Baranowski wrote:
>> I can move PEs to some lib just to kill this issue. Where should this thing end
up ?
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Brian Stansberry"<brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com>
>> To: jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2012 7:13:28 PM
>> Subject: Re: [jboss-as7-dev] What to do about jboss-common-core?
>>
>> On 3/7/12 9:37 AM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
>>> On 03/07/2012 08:35 AM, Brian Stansberry wrote:
>>>> We need to decide what we want to do about usage of the
>>>> jboss-common-core library.
>>> Pulling things into AS is definitely the wrong thing to do. I
>>> definitely agree on that score. I think the thing to do is to start
>>> fragmenting common-core into categories until everything we use has been
>>> put into its own library, and everything we don't use can then be
dropped.
>>>
> I assume you with categories you mean maven modules under a single maven
> project with a single release cycle?
No, that defeats the point really. For the most part, common-core
consists of a pile of completely unrelated functions. There's no reason
to tie their release cycle together, especially as most modules will be
static for a long time with little or no interdependence.
> We can start of with 'jboss-common' and a legacy module 'core' which
is
> deprecated by design.
>
> PEs can then go into a module 'beans'.
>
> Let it only have a dependency on JRE and nothing else for the moment.
> I think we'll find a reason to include logging stuff at some point.
Definitely not.
>
http://github.com/jboss/jboss-common ?
No.
Cool. In that case PEs can go into a standalone project at
http://github.com/jboss/jboss-common-beans.
Ok can someone create this repo?
Carlo
>> Any volunteers?
>>
>> We've talked about the need for this for a long time, but no one has
>> done it.
>>
>>>> A pull request[1] has come in that brings a bunch of jboss-common-core
>>>> classes into the AS 7 codebase.
>>>> [...]
>>> For the property editor stuff, which seems to be the bulk of this
>>> change, if it's widely used, perhaps a dedicated property editor library
>>> is called for. Aleš, does the POJO deployment subsystem use this code?
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
_______________________________________________
jboss-as7-dev mailing list
jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev