On 2/25/2013 8:07 PM, Brian Stansberry wrote:
> * I'd like to change the JBoss AS distribution to use this
new
> jboss-modules maven artifact feature. This requires modifying
> module.xml creation as well as creating and distributing a local maven
> repository with the jars needed.
>
This is a pretty big change for our distribution model, particularly for
doing things like shipping patches. Sounds interesting as an alternative
form of distribution though. It might work fine as the only form of
distribution, although I think we'd need to pretty thoroughly vet it
before making that move.
I agree its an idea that needs to be vetted. But here's what a distro
would look like:
bin/
standalone/
modules/
jboss-maven-repository/
The interesting thing is that you can have a distro without the
repository. Patching would change to adding a new jar to the maven
repository instead of the modules directory.
Furthermore, since the modules/ directory wouldn't have any jars you
move it under the profile's directory:
bin/
standalone/
modules/
web-profile/
modules/
soa-profile/
modules/
data-profile/
modules/
I said this in a previous email, but it doesn't make much sense to me
why build-time, run-time, and the OS all have their own special way of
distributing and managing java binaries.
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com