[domain@localhost:9999 /] :read-resource(recursive=1)
{
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => {
"namespaces" => [("xsi" =>
"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance")],
<SNIP>
"system-property" => {
"foo" => {"value" => "bar"},
"key" => {"value" => "value"}
},
<SNIP>
Or you can query for a particular property now, i.e.:
domain@localhost:9999 /] /system-property= <TAB>
system-property=foo system-property=key
[domain@localhost:9999 /] /system-property=foo:read-resource
{
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => {"value" => "bar"},
"compensating-operation" => undefined
}
On 18 May 2011, at 12:20, Heiko Braun wrote:
I didn't look at it yet, how does the addressable portion look like?
Can you give me an example?
Ike
On May 18, 2011, at 1:17 PM, Kabir Khan wrote:
> +1
> Related to this - they should probably be addressable in the same way as system
properties are in Brian's commit for AS7-701?
>
http://github.com/jbossas/jboss-as/compare/45fe0a6...8c986cd
>
> On 18 May 2011, at 12:13, Heiko Braun wrote:
>
>>
>> I would suggest we use the existing property format that we have for system
properties:
>>
>>
>> <foo-bar-properties>
>> <property name="DEBUG" value="true"/>
>> </foo-bar-properties>
>>
>>
>> On May 18, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Heiko Braun wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 18, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Kabir Khan wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is it worth consolidating all these into one xml format?
>>>
>>>
>>> definitely.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ike
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>>> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>>
>