I am wondering if we could have some modules in a public repo (maven?)
and if they are required by a deployed artifact, they can be downloaded
to the server.
I think software that we don't provide full formal support like groovy
are good candidates.
Brian Stansberry wrote, On 04/10/2013 07:02 PM (EEST):
Data point: 6MB would be a 4.9% increase in download size vs EAP
6.1.0.Alpha1.
Does this groovy integration involve any integration code? I assume so
(to make the module visible), otherwise users would have to declare
module dependencies, which for many may be harder than just packaging
the jar.
Do we intend to formally support this over the long run? If not, any
integration will need to be ripped out at the start of productization.
On 4/10/13 10:37 AM, ssilvert(a)redhat.com wrote:
> On 4/10/2013 10:26 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Resending - this time replying to the list.
>>
>> Does it have to be a module that we ship? Or would it work if users
>> added it as a simple Java EE library to their application
>> (.war/WEB-INF/lib for example)?
> Adding it to your WAR is something you can do today.
>
> I'm asking for opinions on shipping it with AS so that JSF apps have
> this capability by default.
>
> I won't really argue either way. It's trivial to add and very, very
> trivial to leave out.
>
>>
>> -Jaikiran
>>
>> On Wednesday 10 April 2013 05:56 PM, ssilvert(a)redhat.com wrote:
>>> Mojarra has supported Groovy for quite some time now. It's kind of neat
>>> because you can prototype JSF artifacts with Groovy and achieve dynamic
>>> reloading of these artifacts during development. Here is the original
>>> introduction to this feature from way back in 2008.
>>>
https://blogs.oracle.com/rlubke/entry/groovy_mojarra
>>>
>>> Today, if you want to use this feature with AS you have to download
>>> Groovy and package it with your WAR.
>>>
>>> I have the code already written to add Groovy support to AS8 and it
>>> works well. The only downside is that it introduces a module for
>>> groovy-all.jar, which is about 6MB.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts?
>>>
>>> Stan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>>> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>