It could be a socket binding reference on a standalone server, but it's
a chicken-and-egg thing on a Host Controller. The socket binding stuff
comes from domain.xml (and is a server config anyway) and a slave HC
needs to open the socket before it can contact the master DC to even
learn what's in domain.xml.
I know there's a JIRA about this (created by Scott Stark and assigned to
him) but I'm not sure if he was working on it.
On 11/1/11 1:44 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I just noticed that the management port(s) aren't backed by
socket-binding references:
<management-interfaces>
<native-interface interface="management" port="9999"/>
<http-interface interface="management" port="9990"/>
</management-interfaces>
Is this intentional? I kind of remember some discussion around this but
can't find any thread/JIRA for reference. I just ran into a problem
while trying to start multiple AS7 (standalone) instances and realized
that the port-offset on the socket binding group (obviously) has no
effect on these 2 ports.
Are we planning to change this to be backed by socket-binding
references? It's probably going to affect some management operation
(just write-attribute?) but atleast it will be consistent with the rest
of the port handling.
-Jaikiran
_______________________________________________
jboss-as7-dev mailing list
jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
--
Brian Stansberry
Principal Software Engineer
JBoss by Red Hat