Sorry, I don't completely understand the issue. Are you saying that
whatever distinct name you specify in the EJB3 subsystem is not being
used by the deployed EJBs?
-Jaikiran
On Wednesday 04 July 2012 07:59 PM, Wolf-Dieter Fink wrote:
I want to set
<default-distinct-name value="${server.distinct.name:}"/>
<!--
default to "" empty -->
for the ejb3 subsystem.
If I look into the sources for ModelNode this should work, also do a
simple mail-class test ;)
Also if I set later in the server-group
<system-properties><property name="server.distinct.name"
value=""/>
The result is the same:
EJBCLIENT000025: No EJB receiver available for handling [appName:apptwo,
moduleName:ejb, distinctName:]
If I set property to "XX" or default-distinct-name to
"${server.distinct.name:XX}" (and don't set property)
everything works fine.
I suppose that there is something wrong with the setting for the
receiver, but I don't see anything in TRACE level that give me an idea.
Does anybody can help?
- Wolf
_______________________________________________
jboss-as7-dev mailing list
jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev