[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3198) Reenabling an application prevents it from deployement after a restart
by Emmanuel Hugonnet (JIRA)
Emmanuel Hugonnet created WFLY-3198:
---------------------------------------
Summary: Reenabling an application prevents it from deployement after a restart
Key: WFLY-3198
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3198
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: ConfigAdmin
Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Final
Reporter: Emmanuel Hugonnet
Assignee: Emmanuel Hugonnet
After disabling and then re-enabling the application, I don't see Application.war.deployed; I still see Application.war.undeployed.
That explains why it doesn't get deployed after restart.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-2883) ManagementResourceRegistration.getOverrideModel never returns null
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFLY-2883:
-----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 9.0.0.CR1
(was: 8.0.1.Final)
> ManagementResourceRegistration.getOverrideModel never returns null
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-2883
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2883
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Domain Management
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
> Fix For: 9.0.0.CR1
>
>
> ManagementResourceRegistration.getOverrideModel ends up returning the wildcard registration if there is no override registration. This isn't correct.
> The fix isn't trivial because fixing it results in nasty failures in the smoke tests. From looking at the uses of this method (which all involve a null check) I assume there are some bugs in the code that calls this method that get exposed once it does what it should.
> This bug is the cause of the initial failure of my WFLY-2880 fix.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-1536) Hangs in mixed domain testsuite
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-1536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFLY-1536:
-----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 9.0.0.CR1
(was: 8.0.1.Final)
Bumping to 9, but this is likely out-of-date as I'm no longer seeing these issues in CI.
> Hangs in mixed domain testsuite
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-1536
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-1536
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Domain Management
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
> Fix For: 9.0.0.CR1
>
> Attachments: testsuite-hang1-server.txt, testsuite-hang2-client.txt, testsuite-hang2-server.txt
>
>
> http://lightning.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/jenkins/job/wildfly-param-pull...
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/712508/mixed-hang-debug.zip contains details.
> 30805.dump is the client and shows the problem is occurring in the @After cleanup of MixedDomainDeploymentTest as it removes deployments from the domain.
> "main" prio=10 tid=0xf7605c00 nid=0x7856 in Object.wait() [0xf776e000]
> java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor)
> at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
> - waiting on <0xe50275f0> (a org.jboss.as.protocol.mgmt.ActiveOperationSupport$ActiveOperationImpl)
> at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:503)
> at org.jboss.threads.AsyncFutureTask.await(AsyncFutureTask.java:192)
> - locked <0xe50275f0> (a org.jboss.as.protocol.mgmt.ActiveOperationSupport$ActiveOperationImpl)
> at org.jboss.threads.AsyncFutureTask.get(AsyncFutureTask.java:266)
> - locked <0xe50275f0> (a org.jboss.as.protocol.mgmt.ActiveOperationSupport$ActiveOperationImpl)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.client.impl.AbstractDelegatingAsyncFuture.get(AbstractDelegatingAsyncFuture.java:100)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.client.impl.AbstractModelControllerClient.executeForResult(AbstractModelControllerClient.java:127)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.client.impl.AbstractModelControllerClient.execute(AbstractModelControllerClient.java:71)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.client.helpers.domain.impl.DomainClientImpl.execute(DomainClientImpl.java:81)
> at org.jboss.as.test.integration.domain.mixed.MixedDomainDeploymentTest.removeDeployment(MixedDomainDeploymentTest.java:441)
> at org.jboss.as.test.integration.domain.mixed.MixedDomainDeploymentTest.cleanDeployments(MixedDomainDeploymentTest.java:343)
> at org.jboss.as.test.integration.domain.mixed.MixedDomainDeploymentTest.confirmNoDeployments(MixedDomainDeploymentTest.java:163)
> 31894.dump shows the master HC. management-handler-thread is blocking on the way out (after sending the commit or rollback) waiting for a final result response from the slave.
> "management-handler-thread - 1" prio=10 tid=0xca0efc00 nid=0x7cdd in Object.wait() [0xc7469000]
> java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor)
> at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
> - waiting on <0xeb6d6558> (a org.jboss.as.protocol.mgmt.ActiveOperationSupport$ActiveOperationImpl)
> at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:503)
> at org.jboss.threads.AsyncFutureTask.await(AsyncFutureTask.java:192)
> - locked <0xeb6d6558> (a org.jboss.as.protocol.mgmt.ActiveOperationSupport$ActiveOperationImpl)
> at org.jboss.threads.AsyncFutureTask.get(AsyncFutureTask.java:266)
> - locked <0xeb6d6558> (a org.jboss.as.protocol.mgmt.ActiveOperationSupport$ActiveOperationImpl)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.client.impl.AbstractDelegatingAsyncFuture.get(AbstractDelegatingAsyncFuture.java:100)
> at org.jboss.as.domain.controller.operations.coordination.DomainSlaveHandler.finalizeOp(DomainSlaveHandler.java:215)
> at org.jboss.as.domain.controller.operations.coordination.DomainSlaveHandler.access$000(DomainSlaveHandler.java:58)
> at org.jboss.as.domain.controller.operations.coordination.DomainSlaveHandler$1.handleResult(DomainSlaveHandler.java:179)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext$Step.handleRollback(AbstractOperationContext.java:805)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext$Step.finalizeInternal(AbstractOperationContext.java:763)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext$Step.finalizeStep(AbstractOperationContext.java:738)
> (Note that the "handleRollback" method name is a red-herring -- the method should be renamed to a "handleResult" as it now is called no matter what the result.)
> 31986.dump is the slave HC. It shows it is blocking in stage DONE after having sent operationPrepared to the master, waiting for commit or rollback.
> "domain-connection-threads - 1" prio=10 tid=0xc91a8400 nid=0x7d1a waiting on condition [0xc87fe000]
> java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
> at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
> - parking to wait for <0xea1fd410> (a java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch$Sync)
> at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:186)
> at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.parkAndCheckInterrupt(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:834)
> at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcquireSharedInterruptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:994)
> at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquireSharedInterruptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1303)
> at java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch.await(CountDownLatch.java:236)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.remote.TransactionalProtocolOperationHandler$ProxyOperationControlProxy.operationPrepared(TransactionalProtocolOperationHandler.java:173)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext.doCompleteStep(AbstractOperationContext.java:337)
> at org.jboss.as.controller.AbstractOperationContext.completeStep(AbstractOperationContext.java:211)
> at org.jboss.as.domain.controller.operations.coordination.ServerOperationsResolverHandler.execute(ServerOperationsResolverHandler.java:128)
> Indication is the commit or rollback message is getting lost. There are no threads shown sending or receiving it.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3090) Administrative cancellation of management ops results in closed connections
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFLY-3090:
-----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 9.0.0.CR1
(was: 8.0.1.Final)
> Administrative cancellation of management ops results in closed connections
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-3090
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3090
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Domain Management
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
> Fix For: 9.0.0.CR1
>
>
> Administrative cancellation of management ops is implemented by the thread that is handling the cancellation interrupting the thread that is executing the op. This works, but the thread executing the op can't readily distinguish between interruption do to admin action and cancellation for other reasons such as server shutdown. The OperationContext code detects interruption but restores the interrupted state to the thread, which is valid for the shutdown case. For the administrative cancellation case, it has the negative side effect of producing InterruptedExceptions later on; e.g. when the thread attempts to send data to the remote caller.
> This is particularly an issue in domain mode where the "caller" is a controlling process (HC). The InterruptedException has the effect of terminating the connection from the callee to the controlling process.
> The operation execution code needs to be able to distinguish between administrative cancellation and other causes of interruption.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-3092) ServerUpdateResultHandler does nothing
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFLY-3092:
-----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 9.0.0.CR1
(was: 8.0.1.Final)
> ServerUpdateResultHandler does nothing
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-3092
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3092
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Domain Management
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
> Fix For: 9.0.0.CR1
>
>
> The domain op rollout logic's AbstractServerUpdateTask.ServerUpdateResultHandler interface is serving no purpose and should be removed. It's cruft left from earlier implementations.
> The only impl stores data in a map that never gets read.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 9 months