[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-11720) Cannot invoke EJB over HTTP on JDK 11
by Cheng Fang (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Cheng Fang commented on WFLY-11720:
-----------------------------------
Opened PR for WEJBHTTP-24 and EJBCLIENT-323 to upgrade jboss-marshalling in wildfly-http-client and jboss-ejb-client.
> Cannot invoke EJB over HTTP on JDK 11
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-11720
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11720
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: EJB, Remoting
> Affects Versions: 16.0.0.Beta1
> Environment: JDK 11
> Reporter: Jan Kašík
> Assignee: Cheng Fang
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: classes.zip, client-app.zip
>
>
> Run of client app calling EJB over HTTP fails on JDK 11 with following log:
> {noformat}
> Feb 14, 2019 12:49:30 PM org.wildfly.naming.client.Version <clinit>
> INFO: WildFly Naming version 1.0.6.Final
> WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred
> WARNING: Illegal reflective access by org.wildfly.security.manager.GetAccessibleDeclaredFieldAction (file:/home/hudson/hudson_workspace/mod_cluster/client/wildfly-elytron-1.1.3.Final.jar) to field java.security.AccessControlContext.context
> WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of org.wildfly.security.manager.GetAccessibleDeclaredFieldAction
> WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings of further illegal reflective access operations
> WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in a future release
> Feb 14, 2019 12:49:30 PM org.wildfly.security.Version <clinit>
> INFO: ELY00001: WildFly Elytron version 1.1.3.Final
> Feb 14, 2019 12:49:30 PM org.jboss.ejb.client.EJBClient <clinit>
> INFO: JBoss EJB Client version 4.0.2.Final
> Feb 14, 2019 12:49:30 PM org.xnio.Xnio <clinit>
> INFO: XNIO version 3.6.5.Final
> Feb 14, 2019 12:49:30 PM org.xnio.nio.NioXnio <clinit>
> INFO: XNIO NIO Implementation Version 3.6.5.Final
> Feb 14, 2019 12:49:30 PM org.jboss.threads.Version <clinit>
> INFO: JBoss Threads version 2.3.0.Beta2
> Feb 14, 2019 12:49:30 PM org.jboss.remoting3.EndpointImpl <clinit>
> INFO: JBoss Remoting version 5.0.0.Final
> Feb 14, 2019 12:49:30 PM org.jboss.threads.LoggingUncaughtExceptionHandler uncaughtException
> ERROR: Thread Thread[XNIO-1 task-1,5,main] threw an uncaught exception
> java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
> at org.jboss.marshalling.river.RiverMarshaller.<clinit>(RiverMarshaller.java:1335)
> at org.jboss.marshalling.river.RiverMarshallerFactory.createMarshaller(RiverMarshallerFactory.java:54)
> at org.wildfly.httpclient.common.HttpTargetContext.createMarshaller(HttpTargetContext.java:132)
> at org.wildfly.httpclient.ejb.HttpEJBReceiver.marshalEJBRequest(HttpEJBReceiver.java:367)
> at org.wildfly.httpclient.ejb.HttpEJBReceiver.lambda$processInvocation$1(HttpEJBReceiver.java:185)
> at org.wildfly.httpclient.common.HttpTargetContext$1.lambda$completed$0(HttpTargetContext.java:338)
> at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor.safeRun(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1871)
> at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor$ThreadBody.run(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1400)
> at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834)
> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: No standard field found for reverse order comparator!
> at org.jboss.marshalling.river.Protocol.<clinit>(Protocol.java:287)
> ... 9 more
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
2 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-11800) Cannot invoke EJB over HTTP on JDK 11
by Cheng Fang (Jira)
Cheng Fang created WFLY-11800:
---------------------------------
Summary: Cannot invoke EJB over HTTP on JDK 11
Key: WFLY-11800
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11800
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Bug
Components: EJB, Remoting
Affects Versions: 16.0.0.Beta1
Environment: JDK 11
Reporter: Cheng Fang
Assignee: Cheng Fang
Run of client app calling EJB over HTTP fails on JDK 11 with following log:
{noformat}
Feb 14, 2019 12:49:30 PM org.wildfly.naming.client.Version <clinit>
INFO: WildFly Naming version 1.0.6.Final
WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred
WARNING: Illegal reflective access by org.wildfly.security.manager.GetAccessibleDeclaredFieldAction (file:/home/hudson/hudson_workspace/mod_cluster/client/wildfly-elytron-1.1.3.Final.jar) to field java.security.AccessControlContext.context
WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of org.wildfly.security.manager.GetAccessibleDeclaredFieldAction
WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings of further illegal reflective access operations
WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in a future release
Feb 14, 2019 12:49:30 PM org.wildfly.security.Version <clinit>
INFO: ELY00001: WildFly Elytron version 1.1.3.Final
Feb 14, 2019 12:49:30 PM org.jboss.ejb.client.EJBClient <clinit>
INFO: JBoss EJB Client version 4.0.2.Final
Feb 14, 2019 12:49:30 PM org.xnio.Xnio <clinit>
INFO: XNIO version 3.6.5.Final
Feb 14, 2019 12:49:30 PM org.xnio.nio.NioXnio <clinit>
INFO: XNIO NIO Implementation Version 3.6.5.Final
Feb 14, 2019 12:49:30 PM org.jboss.threads.Version <clinit>
INFO: JBoss Threads version 2.3.0.Beta2
Feb 14, 2019 12:49:30 PM org.jboss.remoting3.EndpointImpl <clinit>
INFO: JBoss Remoting version 5.0.0.Final
Feb 14, 2019 12:49:30 PM org.jboss.threads.LoggingUncaughtExceptionHandler uncaughtException
ERROR: Thread Thread[XNIO-1 task-1,5,main] threw an uncaught exception
java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
at org.jboss.marshalling.river.RiverMarshaller.<clinit>(RiverMarshaller.java:1335)
at org.jboss.marshalling.river.RiverMarshallerFactory.createMarshaller(RiverMarshallerFactory.java:54)
at org.wildfly.httpclient.common.HttpTargetContext.createMarshaller(HttpTargetContext.java:132)
at org.wildfly.httpclient.ejb.HttpEJBReceiver.marshalEJBRequest(HttpEJBReceiver.java:367)
at org.wildfly.httpclient.ejb.HttpEJBReceiver.lambda$processInvocation$1(HttpEJBReceiver.java:185)
at org.wildfly.httpclient.common.HttpTargetContext$1.lambda$completed$0(HttpTargetContext.java:338)
at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor.safeRun(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1871)
at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor$ThreadBody.run(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1400)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834)
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: No standard field found for reverse order comparator!
at org.jboss.marshalling.river.Protocol.<clinit>(Protocol.java:287)
... 9 more
{noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
2 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-11799) Cannot invoke EJB over HTTP on JDK 11
by Cheng Fang (Jira)
Cheng Fang created WFLY-11799:
---------------------------------
Summary: Cannot invoke EJB over HTTP on JDK 11
Key: WFLY-11799
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11799
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Bug
Components: EJB, Remoting
Affects Versions: 16.0.0.Beta1
Environment: JDK 11
Reporter: Cheng Fang
Assignee: Cheng Fang
Run of client app calling EJB over HTTP fails on JDK 11 with following log:
{noformat}
Feb 14, 2019 12:49:30 PM org.wildfly.naming.client.Version <clinit>
INFO: WildFly Naming version 1.0.6.Final
WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred
WARNING: Illegal reflective access by org.wildfly.security.manager.GetAccessibleDeclaredFieldAction (file:/home/hudson/hudson_workspace/mod_cluster/client/wildfly-elytron-1.1.3.Final.jar) to field java.security.AccessControlContext.context
WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of org.wildfly.security.manager.GetAccessibleDeclaredFieldAction
WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings of further illegal reflective access operations
WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in a future release
Feb 14, 2019 12:49:30 PM org.wildfly.security.Version <clinit>
INFO: ELY00001: WildFly Elytron version 1.1.3.Final
Feb 14, 2019 12:49:30 PM org.jboss.ejb.client.EJBClient <clinit>
INFO: JBoss EJB Client version 4.0.2.Final
Feb 14, 2019 12:49:30 PM org.xnio.Xnio <clinit>
INFO: XNIO version 3.6.5.Final
Feb 14, 2019 12:49:30 PM org.xnio.nio.NioXnio <clinit>
INFO: XNIO NIO Implementation Version 3.6.5.Final
Feb 14, 2019 12:49:30 PM org.jboss.threads.Version <clinit>
INFO: JBoss Threads version 2.3.0.Beta2
Feb 14, 2019 12:49:30 PM org.jboss.remoting3.EndpointImpl <clinit>
INFO: JBoss Remoting version 5.0.0.Final
Feb 14, 2019 12:49:30 PM org.jboss.threads.LoggingUncaughtExceptionHandler uncaughtException
ERROR: Thread Thread[XNIO-1 task-1,5,main] threw an uncaught exception
java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
at org.jboss.marshalling.river.RiverMarshaller.<clinit>(RiverMarshaller.java:1335)
at org.jboss.marshalling.river.RiverMarshallerFactory.createMarshaller(RiverMarshallerFactory.java:54)
at org.wildfly.httpclient.common.HttpTargetContext.createMarshaller(HttpTargetContext.java:132)
at org.wildfly.httpclient.ejb.HttpEJBReceiver.marshalEJBRequest(HttpEJBReceiver.java:367)
at org.wildfly.httpclient.ejb.HttpEJBReceiver.lambda$processInvocation$1(HttpEJBReceiver.java:185)
at org.wildfly.httpclient.common.HttpTargetContext$1.lambda$completed$0(HttpTargetContext.java:338)
at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor.safeRun(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1871)
at org.jboss.threads.EnhancedQueueExecutor$ThreadBody.run(EnhancedQueueExecutor.java:1400)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834)
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: No standard field found for reverse order comparator!
at org.jboss.marshalling.river.Protocol.<clinit>(Protocol.java:287)
... 9 more
{noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
2 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3077) Enhance data type restrictions UX - Decision Table/properties
by Liz Clayton (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Liz Clayton commented on DROOLS-3077:
-------------------------------------
[~karreiro] [~manstis]
The latest direction for the Input Clause pop-over is:
https://redhat.invisionapp.com/share/8BQRVFUVU3Z#/349667215_Input1
(this is a rough version, still need to do some clean-up, but it shows the basic flow). The basic changes are as follows:
* Explicit Save/Cancel buttons.
* If user enters a Data Type that has constraints already applied to them, they are displayed as read-only. The user will need Add more constraints by going through the Data Type (a story for another sprint.) In this case on the Manage link is available for that action.
* If the user select a type without constraints, then they can add constraints via this pop-over. The otherwise hidden Action to Add is enabled (presented). Clicking that will open a dialog for just adding to the Input clause. The user enter the values and round-trip back to the pop-over for confirmation before saving. Once saved the table is updated. Wdyt?
> Enhance data type restrictions UX - Decision Table/properties
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3077
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3077
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Story
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Liz Clayton
> Assignee: Liz Clayton
> Priority: Major
> Labels: UX, UXTeam, drools-tools
> Attachments: DataType selection ('Properties Panel' and 'in-grid').png, Screen Shot 2018-08-10 at 10.23.36 AM.png, Screen Shot 2018-08-24 at 8.38.37 AM.png, Screen Shot 2018-09-28 at 2.44.59 PM.png, date-time.png, date.png, enumration-widget.png, pop-overc.png, pop-overcSpecs.png, read-mode.png, select.png, time.png
>
>
> *Background*
> Persona: Business analyst or Rules practitioner
> Use Cases:
> * From the DMN canvas view - as a user I want to define data type restrictions (one-off instances) from a decision table .
> * From the Data Types dialog - as a user I want the ability to define constraints for the following types: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HLYwi5JrCEU6IxWRge7RCKANLiHCL0d2E...
> Functional considerations/ pre conditions:
> * Consider interaction in light of Property panel and consistency.
> * Underscore the notion of one-off constraints.
> Verification conditions:
> * Scrum team and PO review.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
2 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3704) [DMN Designer] Boxed expressions - Decision Table - Input clause - Properties panel is not consistent
by Liz Clayton (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Liz Clayton commented on DROOLS-3704:
-------------------------------------
[~manstis] The latest direction for the Input Clause pop-over is:
https://redhat.invisionapp.com/share/8BQRVFUVU3Z#/349667215_Input1
(this is a rough version, still need to do some clean-up, but it shows the basic flow). I believe [~tirelli] and [~karreiro] have reviewed this, but do let me know if there are any issues. The basic changes are as follows:
* Explicit Save/Cancel buttons.
* If user enters a Data Type that has constraints already applied to them, they are displayed as read-only. The user will need Add more constraints by going through the Data Type (a story for another sprint.) In this case on the Manage link is available for that action.
* If the user select a type without constraints, then they can add constraints via this pop-over. The otherwise hidden Action to Add is enabled (presented). Clicking that will open a dialog for just adding to the Input clause. The user enter the values and round-trip back to the pop-over for confirmation before saving. Once saved the table is updated. Wdyt?
As far as consistency goes: I'm a little confused about that myself. I thought I had heard [~tirelli] say if we can resolve this action satisfactorily in the pop-over we might not need to repeat it in the Properties panel.
> [DMN Designer] Boxed expressions - Decision Table - Input clause - Properties panel is not consistent
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3704
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3704
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Guilherme Carreiro
> Assignee: Michael Anstis
> Priority: Major
> Labels: drools-tools
> Attachments: 1.png, DROOLS-3704.png
>
>
> Properties panel is not consistent with the popover:
> !1.png|thumbnail!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
2 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3659) DMN: UX for documentation reports
by Liz Clayton (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Liz Clayton commented on DROOLS-3659:
-------------------------------------
[~manstis] [~jomarko] Hi, hoping to mark this as Resolved tomorrow, after you also have a chance to review it: https://redhat.invisionapp.com/share/JSQRRG2ZU8K#/screens/349631211_Doc1
> DMN: UX for documentation reports
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3659
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3659
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Story
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Liz Clayton
> Assignee: Liz Clayton
> Priority: Major
> Labels: UX, UXTeam, drools-tools
>
> User stories:
> * As a user I want to generate a PDF or HTML report of the DMN model, with documentation, so that I can hand it off to external team and/or business that needs information about the diagrams and the logic of the decisions being automated. The report can be printed out and used by business teams not involved with the modeling itself, to learn about content of the .dmn file.
> * As a user I need a means through the UI to input additional documentation, links and attachments to nodes.
> Notes:
> - Docs to help with docs formatting.
> - Might be able to leverage Case View docs widget.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
2 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3659) DMN: UX for documentation reports
by Liz Clayton (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Liz Clayton commented on DROOLS-3659:
-------------------------------------
[~tirelli] I have a design proposal for the Documentation attachments at the node level: https://redhat.invisionapp.com/share/JSQRRG2ZU8K#/349631211_Doc1. [~karreiro] and [~stetson.robinson] have reviewed it already and I've made their revisions. I'd like to mark this as done if it looks Ok to you.
* The overall report documentation is covered through the Stunner tab discussed above, and the template that [~stetson.robinson] has designed.
> DMN: UX for documentation reports
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3659
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3659
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Story
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Liz Clayton
> Assignee: Liz Clayton
> Priority: Major
> Labels: UX, UXTeam, drools-tools
>
> User stories:
> * As a user I want to generate a PDF or HTML report of the DMN model, with documentation, so that I can hand it off to external team and/or business that needs information about the diagrams and the logic of the decisions being automated. The report can be printed out and used by business teams not involved with the modeling itself, to learn about content of the .dmn file.
> * As a user I need a means through the UI to input additional documentation, links and attachments to nodes.
> Notes:
> - Docs to help with docs formatting.
> - Might be able to leverage Case View docs widget.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
2 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3659) DMN: UX for documentation reports
by Liz Clayton (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Liz Clayton commented on DROOLS-3659:
-------------------------------------
Thanks [~tdolphine]! FYI ^^ [~stetson.robinson] and [~manstis]. :)
> DMN: UX for documentation reports
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3659
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3659
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Story
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Liz Clayton
> Assignee: Liz Clayton
> Priority: Major
> Labels: UX, UXTeam, drools-tools
>
> User stories:
> * As a user I want to generate a PDF or HTML report of the DMN model, with documentation, so that I can hand it off to external team and/or business that needs information about the diagrams and the logic of the decisions being automated. The report can be printed out and used by business teams not involved with the modeling itself, to learn about content of the .dmn file.
> * As a user I need a means through the UI to input additional documentation, links and attachments to nodes.
> Notes:
> - Docs to help with docs formatting.
> - Might be able to leverage Case View docs widget.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
2 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3704) [DMN Designer] Boxed expressions - Decision Table - Input clause - Properties panel is not consistent
by Michael Anstis (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Michael Anstis edited comment on DROOLS-3704 at 2/28/19 4:06 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[~uxdlc] [~karreiro] could you please advise what is currently considered _consistent_?
I've attached a screenshot showing what I've developed ({{InputClause}} name and data-type included in the Properties Panel).
!DROOLS-3704.png|thumbnail!
I am however unsure whether we're to include any _constraint_ details in the Properties Panel... or will any changes there be made when the JIRA relating to adding constraints for {{InputClause}}'s is worked on?
was (Author: manstis):
[~uxdlc] [~karreiro] could you please advise what is currently considered _consistent_?
I've attached a screenshot showing what I've developed ({{InputClause}} name and data-type included in the Properties Panel).
!DROOLS-3704.png|thumbnail!
I am however unsure whether we're to include any _constraint_ details in the Properties Panel... or will any changes there be made when the JIRA relating to adding constraints for {{InputClause}}s is worked on?
> [DMN Designer] Boxed expressions - Decision Table - Input clause - Properties panel is not consistent
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3704
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3704
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Guilherme Carreiro
> Assignee: Michael Anstis
> Priority: Major
> Labels: drools-tools
> Attachments: 1.png, DROOLS-3704.png
>
>
> Properties panel is not consistent with the popover:
> !1.png|thumbnail!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
2 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3704) [DMN Designer] Boxed expressions - Decision Table - Input clause - Properties panel is not consistent
by Michael Anstis (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Michael Anstis commented on DROOLS-3704:
----------------------------------------
[~uxdlc] [~karreiro] could you please advise what is currently considered _consistent_?
I've attached a screenshot showing what I've developed ({{InputClause}} name and data-type included in the Properties Panel).
!DROOLS-3704.png|thumbnail!
I am however unsure whether we're to include any _constraint_ details in the Properties Panel... or will any changes there be made when the JIRA relating to adding constraints for {{InputClause}}s is worked on?
> [DMN Designer] Boxed expressions - Decision Table - Input clause - Properties panel is not consistent
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3704
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3704
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Guilherme Carreiro
> Assignee: Michael Anstis
> Priority: Major
> Labels: drools-tools
> Attachments: 1.png, DROOLS-3704.png
>
>
> Properties panel is not consistent with the popover:
> !1.png|thumbnail!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
2 years, 2 months