[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2475) Upgrade Jackson dependencies.
by Eli Israel (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Eli Israel commented on DROOLS-2475:
------------------------------------
Latest Wildfly is now 12.0.0.Final. Any chance of an updated KIE Execution Server WAR?
> Upgrade Jackson dependencies.
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-2475
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2475
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Petar Tahchiev
> Assignee: Maciej Swiderski
> Priority: Critical
>
> Hello,
> I'm not sure this is the right place to report this, but I couldn't find a better one. In my project I'm using:
> {code}
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.kie.server</groupId>
> <artifactId>kie-server-jms</artifactId>
> <version>7.7.0.Final</version>
> </dependency>
> {code}
> and I believe you guys are using jackson version 2.8.9:
> https://github.com/kiegroup/kie-soup/blob/master/pom.xml#L56
> which is already 1 year old. In my app some third-party dependencies are bringing jackson 2.9.5 and because of this mismatch I get the following exception when I run my app:
> {code}
> Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.SerializationConfig.with(Lcom/fasterxml/jackson/databind/AnnotationIntrospector;)Lcom/fasterxml/jackson/databind/SerializationConfig;
> at org.kie.server.api.marshalling.json.JSONMarshaller.configureMarshaller(JSONMarshaller.java:153)
> at org.kie.server.api.marshalling.json.JSONMarshaller.<init>(JSONMarshaller.java:128)
> at org.kie.server.api.marshalling.BaseMarshallerBuilder.build(BaseMarshallerBuilder.java:43)
> at org.kie.server.api.marshalling.MarshallerFactory.getMarshaller(MarshallerFactory.java:52)
> at org.kie.server.client.impl.AbstractKieServicesClientImpl.<init>(AbstractKieServicesClientImpl.java:83)
> at org.kie.server.client.impl.KieServicesClientImpl.<init>(KieServicesClientImpl.java:71)
> at org.kie.server.client.KieServicesFactory.newKieServicesClient(KieServicesFactory.java:101)
> at com.nemesis.platform.module.ruleservices.config.RuleServicesModuleAutoConfiguration.defaultKieServicesClient(RuleServicesModuleAutoConfiguration.java:160)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
5 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2532) UX design for scenario simulation
by Liz Clayton (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Liz Clayton updated DROOLS-2532:
--------------------------------
Labels: Appformer UX UXTeam (was: UX UXTeam)
> UX design for scenario simulation
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-2532
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2532
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Liz Clayton
> Assignee: Liz Clayton
> Labels: Appformer, UX, UXTeam
> Attachments: roundE-scaled.pdf
>
>
> As Aimee or Cameron I want to:
> * Easily create a test scenario template through the use of variable/data object placeholders so that I can create test scenarios against a single decision.
> * Define test scenarios through a UI so I can develop basic task scenarios with minimal engagement from IT.
> * Run a test scenario simulation so that I can verify the expected results against test simulation results.
> Verification conditions:
> Provide wireframe design and click-thru prototype which includes the following views:
> * Overview (properties)
> * Scenario Template
> * Scenarios Input Screen
> * Results
> * Code View
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
5 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2532) UX design for scenario simulation
by Liz Clayton (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Liz Clayton commented on DROOLS-2532:
-------------------------------------
Uploaded current wireframes, as pdf, covering:
* Creating a scenario test asset against a single decision.
* Test "model" encompasses both the outline and inputs via a singular via tabular model.
* Results as alert messages, along with an alternative design that includes a test results summary.
* Right dock for supporting guidance such as syntax cheatsheet.
Note: Still working on "Expect" input interaction details.
> UX design for scenario simulation
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-2532
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2532
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Liz Clayton
> Assignee: Liz Clayton
> Labels: Appformer, UX, UXTeam
> Attachments: roundE-scaled.pdf
>
>
> As Aimee or Cameron I want to:
> * Easily create a test scenario template through the use of variable/data object placeholders so that I can create test scenarios against a single decision.
> * Define test scenarios through a UI so I can develop basic task scenarios with minimal engagement from IT.
> * Run a test scenario simulation so that I can verify the expected results against test simulation results.
> Verification conditions:
> Provide wireframe design and click-thru prototype which includes the following views:
> * Overview (properties)
> * Scenario Template
> * Scenarios Input Screen
> * Results
> * Code View
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
5 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2532) UX design for scenario simulation
by Liz Clayton (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Liz Clayton updated DROOLS-2532:
--------------------------------
Attachment: roundE-scaled.pdf
> UX design for scenario simulation
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-2532
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2532
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Liz Clayton
> Assignee: Liz Clayton
> Labels: UX, UXTeam
> Attachments: roundE-scaled.pdf
>
>
> As Aimee or Cameron I want to:
> * Easily create a test scenario template through the use of variable/data object placeholders so that I can create test scenarios against a single decision.
> * Define test scenarios through a UI so I can develop basic task scenarios with minimal engagement from IT.
> * Run a test scenario simulation so that I can verify the expected results against test simulation results.
> Verification conditions:
> Provide wireframe design and click-thru prototype which includes the following views:
> * Overview (properties)
> * Scenario Template
> * Scenarios Input Screen
> * Results
> * Code View
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
5 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3639) Elytron error message less comprehensive in jdk9 compared to jdk8
by Jean-Francois Denise (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Jean-Francois Denise reassigned WFCORE-3639:
--------------------------------------------
Assignee: Jean-Francois Denise
> Elytron error message less comprehensive in jdk9 compared to jdk8
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-3639
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3639
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: CLI
> Affects Versions: 4.0.0.Beta1
> Reporter: Martin Choma
> Assignee: Jean-Francois Denise
>
> I like jdk8 error message where there is obvious GS2-KRB5 has been attempted but failed for some reason, PLAIN has been attempted, but failed for some reason.
> {code:title=jdk8}
> Failed to connect to the controller: Unable to authenticate against controller at localhost:9993: Authentication failed: all available authentication mechanisms failed:
> GS2-KRB5: javax.security.sasl.SaslException: GS2-KRB5: Server rejected authentication
> PLAIN: javax.security.sasl.SaslException: ELY05053: Callback handler failed for unknown reason [Caused by java.io.IOException: Failed to read username: Invalid Usage. Prompt attempted in non-interactive mode. Please check commands or change CLI mode.]
> {code}
> Whereas in jdk9 error message hides the fact GS2-KRB5 was attempted and just prints error for PLAIN mechanism, but does not mention explicitely it is PLAIN mechanism
> {code:title=jdk9}
> Failed to connect to the controller: Unable to authenticate against controller at localhost:9993: Cannot get password: Failed to read username: Invalid Usage. Prompt attempted in non-interactive mode. Please check commands or change CLI mode.
> {code}
> This is general question, but I have hit this with this specific use case:
> 1. server is configured to use GS2-KRB5 and PLAIN
> 2. server is configured with TLS
> 3. client is configured to use GS2-KRB5
> 4. expectation is authentication should be not successful because channel binding GS2-KRB5-PLUS should be used.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
5 years, 11 months