[Red Hat JIRA] (DROOLS-5969) Rule relationship analysis graph : handling edge case rules
by Toshiya Kobayashi (Jira)
Toshiya Kobayashi created DROOLS-5969:
-----------------------------------------
Summary: Rule relationship analysis graph : handling edge case rules
Key: DROOLS-5969
URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5969
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Enhancement
Components: core engine
Affects Versions: 7.49.0.Final
Reporter: Toshiya Kobayashi
Assignee: Toshiya Kobayashi
Using real rules, find issues caused by special syntax or usage and fix. Add tests to drools-impact-analysis-itests.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.13.1#813001)
3 years, 3 months
[Red Hat JIRA] (WFLY-14371) EJB timer not executed on Postgres due to timestamp comparison
by Chao Wang (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFLY-14371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Chao Wang updated WFLY-14371:
-----------------------------
Summary: EJB timer not executed on Postgres due to timestamp comparison (was: [GSS](7.3.z) EJB timer not executed on Postgres due to timestamp comparison)
> EJB timer not executed on Postgres due to timestamp comparison
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-14371
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFLY-14371
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: EJB
> Affects Versions: 22.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Chao Wang
> Assignee: Cheng Fang
> Priority: Major
> Labels: support
>
> A single action timer fails to be executed:
> {noformat}
> 15:40:25,613 hz0v DEBUG [org.jboss.as.ejb3.timer] (EJB default - 5) Skipping execution of timer for ROOT.ROOT.EJBTimerScheduler as it is being run on another node or the execution is suppressed by configuration
> {noformat}
> *Environment*:
> * RHPAM 7.7.1
> * EAP 7.2.9
> * OCP 3.11
> * single node setup
> * DB: PostgreSQL 10.12, JDBC version: 42.2.3
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.13.1#813001)
3 years, 3 months
[Red Hat JIRA] (WFLY-14372) Multiple metrics collections
by Brian Stansberry (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFLY-14372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFLY-14372:
------------------------------------
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
> Multiple metrics collections
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-14372
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFLY-14372
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: MP Metrics
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assignee: Jason Lee
> Priority: Critical
>
> See discussion on https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/pull/13871
> Do we have MetricsCollector collecting the container metrics multiple times?
> I haven't thought hard about this, but doesn't the Stage.VERIFY collection in MetricsSubsystemAdd end up re-collecting all the deployment=* subtree metrics already collected in Stage.RUNTIME via DeploymentMetricProcessor/DeploymentMetricService? It walks the whole resource tree from the root.
> If the MP Metrics subsystem is installed, isn't MicroProfileMetricsSubsystemAdd and that subsystem's DeploymentMetricProcessor/DeploymentMetricService also collecting the same set of metrics?
> I'm filing this as a Task because maybe all that's needed is to investigate and answer those questions reporting that all is well. But if all isn't well this should converted to a Bug.
> Also, as discussed on PR #13871, https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/blob/22.0.0.Final/metrics/src/main/jav... is probably not the best idiom given the code is iterating over runtime-only resources, where the cost of hasChildren can be high.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.13.1#813001)
3 years, 3 months
[Red Hat JIRA] (WFLY-14372) Multiple metrics collections
by Brian Stansberry (Jira)
Brian Stansberry created WFLY-14372:
---------------------------------------
Summary: Multiple metrics collections
Key: WFLY-14372
URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFLY-14372
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Task
Components: MP Metrics
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assignee: Jason Lee
See discussion on https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/pull/13871
Do we have MetricsCollector collecting the container metrics multiple times?
I haven't thought hard about this, but doesn't the Stage.VERIFY collection in MetricsSubsystemAdd end up re-collecting all the deployment=* subtree metrics already collected in Stage.RUNTIME via DeploymentMetricProcessor/DeploymentMetricService? It walks the whole resource tree from the root.
If the MP Metrics subsystem is installed, isn't MicroProfileMetricsSubsystemAdd and that subsystem's DeploymentMetricProcessor/DeploymentMetricService also collecting the same set of metrics?
I'm filing this as a Task because maybe all that's needed is to investigate and answer those questions reporting that all is well. But if all isn't well this should converted to a Bug.
Also, as discussed on PR #13871, https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/blob/22.0.0.Final/metrics/src/main/jav... is probably not the best idiom given the code is iterating over runtime-only resources, where the cost of hasChildren can be high.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.13.1#813001)
3 years, 3 months
[Red Hat JIRA] (WFLY-14371) [GSS](7.3.z) EJB timer not executed on Postgres due to timestamp comparison
by Chao Wang (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFLY-14371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Chao Wang reassigned WFLY-14371:
--------------------------------
Assignee: Cheng Fang (was: Chao Wang)
> [GSS](7.3.z) EJB timer not executed on Postgres due to timestamp comparison
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-14371
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFLY-14371
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: EJB
> Affects Versions: 22.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Chao Wang
> Assignee: Cheng Fang
> Priority: Major
> Labels: support
>
> A single action timer fails to be executed:
> {noformat}
> 15:40:25,613 hz0v DEBUG [org.jboss.as.ejb3.timer] (EJB default - 5) Skipping execution of timer for ROOT.ROOT.EJBTimerScheduler as it is being run on another node or the execution is suppressed by configuration
> {noformat}
> *Environment*:
> * RHPAM 7.7.1
> * EAP 7.2.9
> * OCP 3.11
> * single node setup
> * DB: PostgreSQL 10.12, JDBC version: 42.2.3
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.13.1#813001)
3 years, 3 months
[Red Hat JIRA] (WFLY-14371) [GSS](7.3.z) EJB timer not executed on Postgres due to timestamp comparison
by Chao Wang (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFLY-14371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Chao Wang moved JBEAP-20919 to WFLY-14371:
------------------------------------------
Component/s: EJB
(was: EJB)
Fix Version/s: (was: 7.3.6.GA)
Key: WFLY-14371 (was: JBEAP-20919)
Affects Version/s: 22.0.0.Final
(was: 7.2.9.GA)
Workflow: GIT Pull Request workflow (was: CDW with loose statuses v1)
Project: WildFly (was: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform)
> [GSS](7.3.z) EJB timer not executed on Postgres due to timestamp comparison
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-14371
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFLY-14371
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: EJB
> Affects Versions: 22.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Chao Wang
> Assignee: Chao Wang
> Priority: Major
> Labels: support
>
> A single action timer fails to be executed:
> {noformat}
> 15:40:25,613 hz0v DEBUG [org.jboss.as.ejb3.timer] (EJB default - 5) Skipping execution of timer for ROOT.ROOT.EJBTimerScheduler as it is being run on another node or the execution is suppressed by configuration
> {noformat}
> *Environment*:
> * RHPAM 7.7.1
> * EAP 7.2.9
> * OCP 3.11
> * single node setup
> * DB: PostgreSQL 10.12, JDBC version: 42.2.3
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.13.1#813001)
3 years, 3 months
[Red Hat JIRA] (LOGMGR-283) The TCCL should be set when configuring resources
by James Perkins (Jira)
[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/LOGMGR-283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
James Perkins updated LOGMGR-283:
---------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 2.1.18.Final
2.2.0.Final
2.3.0.Beta1
> The TCCL should be set when configuring resources
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LOGMGR-283
> URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/LOGMGR-283
> Project: JBoss Log Manager
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: James Perkins
> Assignee: James Perkins
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.1.18.Final, 2.2.0.Final, 2.3.0.Beta1
>
>
> When configuring resources the TCCL should be set to the class loader for the type being configured. In the case of a modular environment the type may use the TCCL to initialize other types. For example in WildFly if a {{custom-handler}} is used that handler may be in it's own module and attempt to use the TCCL to initialize another type.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.13.1#813001)
3 years, 3 months