January 2008 - jbosstools-dev - Jboss List Archives

by Max Rydahl Andersen

Hi guys, Why are we adding *tons* of duplicated jars and complete JSF/Seam projects just to unittests a few pages with templates?! I can't beleive all of those files are really necessary to check if a myfaces template page will render correctly. Could we please make sure our tests just include what is needed and not add tons of unused things. Thanks! /max

16 years, 10 months

4
10
0 / 0

QA Daily report 30 January 2007

by Anton Klimkovich

This is Daily QA report. (30 January 2008) Free testing on last JBoss tools build VPE testing Bugs verification. Opened: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-1706 http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-1707 http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-1708 http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-1709 http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-1710 http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-1711 -- Best regards, Anton Klimkovich mailto:aklimkovich@exadel.com

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

QA Daily report 29 January 2007

by Anton Klimkovich

This is Daily QA report. (23, 24 January 2008) Free testing on last JBoss tools build VPE testing Bugs verification. Opened http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-1697 http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-1705 -- Best regards, Anton Klimkovich mailto:aklimkovich@exadel.com

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jbosstools-dev] Support of ADF components in VPE survey

by Sergey Vasilyev

Pete Muir wrote: > Assuming we are really talking about Trinidad, not ADF (ADF is the non > opensource varient). > > Coexist with Seam (very) well. > > Coexist with RichFaces ok (there is an integration package). Alex can > comment better. > > No extra issues when you use Seam+RF+Trinidad. You can see the > seamdiscs example for it in operation. > > On 21 Jan 2008, at 16:51, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > >> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:50:27 +0100, Pete Muir <pete.muir(a)jboss.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Technically good, visually appalling. >> >> any known issues/recommendations in context of Seam/richfaces ? Do >> they coexist well/bad? >> >> /max >> >>> >>> On 21 Jan 2008, at 16:40, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >>> >>>> Do we have any coverage of it today ? >>>> >>>> I've cc'ed Pete and Gavin to hear about their experience/feedback >>>> on ADF. >>>> >>>> /max >>>> >>>>> Hi! >>>>> >>>>> I would like to ask all of you about supporting ADF Faces Components >>>>> (http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/adf/adffaces/ >>>>> index.html) in >>>>> our Visual Page Editor. Set of ADF components consists of over 100 >>>>> components. Does the support of ADF components still relevant for us? >>>>> >>>>> Sergey >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ > Unfortunately we are supporting the ADF Faces Components (old versions from uri="http://xmlns.oracle.com/adf/faces/EA10" till uri="http://xmlns.oracle.com/adf/faces/EA13").right now. It is a legacy from Exadel Studio. And I'm speaking about supporting of ADF (not opensource) and Trinidad (http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad). Sergey

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

What is org.jboss.tools.common.model.options.Preference.EDITOR_PATH = "%Options%/Struts Studio/Editors" ?

by Max Rydahl Andersen

I might have asked before, but I forget why we still use Struts Studio here ? What is Struts Studio in this context ? Is this some setting stored locally or just in memory ? /max

16 years, 10 months

2
2
0 / 0

QA Daily report 25, 28 January 2007

by Anton Klimkovich

This is Daily QA report. (25, 28 January 2008) Free testing on last JBoss tools build VPE testing Bugs verification. Opened: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-1694 http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-1698 http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-1700 http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-1701 http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-1702 -- Best regards, Anton Klimkovich mailto:aklimkovich@exadel.com

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

Compilation errors in WTP3 / Eclipse 3.4 aka Ganymede compatibility

by Marshall Culpepper

Hey everyone.. I just imported our codebase into Eclipse 3.4 milestone 4 w/ WTP 3.0 M4 to take a look at our compatibility. Currently we have a number of compilation problems, most of them seem to be internal API dependencies.. but I didn't go over every single one.For reference, I downloaded all the Eclipse 3.4/WTP 3.0 stuff from the following URL: http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R3.0/S-3.0M4-2008010... To summarize the errors, it looks they are pretty much all over the board. I'm seeing deprecated and changed internal APIs being used in all of our components from Hibernate Tools, JBossAS Tools, VPE, Common, to even the older JBossIDE core. *Most* of the errors I'm seeing look to be relatively trivial to fix, but again I haven't gone over every single one. Usually it's a change of a method / class name, or a field that isn't visible anymore. Also keep in mind that getting stuff compiling doesn't mean it actually works, so there might be some bad methods / workarounds we used in old code that won't work with new libraries. As Max said today, I think it would be prudent if we branched now so we can make sure that we have enough time to file bugs and get everything working before the WTP3.0 / Ganymede freeze date which is coming up in a few months.

16 years, 10 months

2
1
0 / 0

QA Daily report 23, 24 January 2008

by Anton Klimkovich

This is Daily QA report. (23, 24 January 2008) Free testing on last JBoss tools build VPE testing Bugs verification. Opened: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-1677 http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-1678 http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-1679 http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-1680 http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-1681 http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-1682 http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-1683 -- Best regards, Anton Klimkovich mailto:aklimkovich@exadel.com

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

Fwd: [wtp-dev] API Scannings

by Max Rydahl Andersen

I always forget this, but we should really get around sending them our adopter report... Anyone up for doing that ? /max ------- Forwarded message ------- From: "Raev, Kaloyan" <kaloyan.raev(a)sap.com> To: "Webtools releng discussion list" <wtp-releng(a)eclipse.org>, "General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev(a)eclipse.org> Cc: Subject: [wtp-dev] API Scannings Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:52:17 +0100 Hello, I have resurrected the API scanning procedure. Almost all of the API scanning steps run properly. I have still some troubles with the code coverage part. I'd like to catch your attention on the Adopter Breakage Report. I have genereated reports for: - R2.0.1: http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R2.0/R-2.0.1-2007092604 2742/apiresults/api-ref-compatibility.html - last M2.0.2 I-build: http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R2.0/M-2.0.2-2007122206 0852/apiresults/api-ref-compatibility.html - 3.0 M4: http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R3.0/S-3.0M4-2008010509 1323/ Compared to the report for R2.0 there are lot of new adopter breakages: http://archive.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R2.0/R-2.0-200706260303/ apiresults/api-ref-compatibility.html I would like also to request adopters, who have already adopted the WTP 2.0.1 release, to provide updated adopter scanner reports for their product based on WTP 2.0.1. This way we can see the real delta between their last adoption and the current development. How to create the report is described here: http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/adopters/tool.html Greetings, Kaloyan Raev Eclipse WTP Committer <http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/people/person.php?name=raev> Senior Developer NW C JS TOOLS JEE (BG) SAP Labs Bulgaria T +359/2/9157-416 mailto:kaloyan.raev@sap.com www.sap.com -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

16 years, 10 months

3
7
0 / 0

code assist

by Vitali Yemialyanchyk

Max, in CompletionHelper -> transpose I find workaround & reference // TODO: eclipse bug https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=84998 Now it possible to use commented block... I can fix this easy. If 2.0.1 for eclipse version 3.3.1. Best regards, Vitali.

16 years, 10 months

2
1
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jbosstools-dev January 2008