April 2011 - jbosstools-dev - Jboss List Archives

M1 Status Update - trunk and maintenance branch

by Nick Boldt

Overall: * 2 stuck slaves (vmg17, hudson1) reported to eng-ops@; one taken down, the other left up because another team's currently using it. * Hudson's next scheduled maintenance is April 29th, 2011 - 6:00AM GMT, so I can't kick jobs to run over night :( --- JBT 3.3.0.M1 / JBDS 5.0.0.M1: * Savara/Scribble missing (refactored?) feature: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8817 (blocks aggregate build) * AS - single test failure: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8816 * VPE had 219 tests on Jan 11; now only 17 tests are running and of those, 6 are failing * Seam has 3 test failures: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8759 --- JBT 3.2.1.M1 / JBDS 4.1.0.M1: * Aggregate builder is fixed (I think!), but hit a network snag trying to fetch latest bits because I disabled the "wait until all upstream are done" option in the job in order to test my latest publish.sh fixes. Respin will fix this & allow me to verify my fix worked, then I can re-enable the block-while-upstream-spinning option. * One last Seam test failure: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8818 * AS & Deltacloud jobs time out after 2hrs; job timeout increased to 3hrs. Would respin but Hudson is in shutdown mode. * JSF was clean (no failures) but now has 7 new tests and 14 new failures: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8819 -- Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio http://nick.divbyzero.com

13 years, 6 months

5
12
0 / 0

JBoss Tools 3.2.1.M1 first builds are available, but some feature/plugin versions may need to be incremented

by Nick Boldt

JBDS 4.1.0.M1 are still pending, but we have a good aggregate build of JBoss Tools 3.2.1.M1 available for early QE testing, from build H786 (or newer): http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/builds/nightly/3.2_stable_branch/lat... http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/nightly/3.2_stable_branch --- Note too that while there are a few plugins which have been upversioned to 3.2.1, there are NO FEATURES which bear this version on them; this will NOT prevent installation of these features on top of JBT 3.2.0 (because we use a timestamp qualifier which guarantees that a more-recently-built feature is always seen as an upgrade), but from a proper versioning [1] & synchronicity with JIRA point of view, at least SOME of the features should bear the correctly updated maintenance version. [1] http://wiki.eclipse.org/Version_Numbering There are currently only three (3) features out of 49 which have been incremented to an x.y.1 or x.y.100 version, which, if only these three components have been updated since the 3.2.0.GA release, is accurate. I'm not sure if that's the case. * org.jboss.tools.cdi.feature_1.1.1.v20110429-0035-H79-M1.jar * org.jboss.tools.deltacloud.feature_0.0.1.v20110428-0936-H172-M1.jar * org.jboss.tools.struts.feature_3.1.1.v20110429-0042-H99-M1.jar -- Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio http://nick.divbyzero.com

13 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jbosstools-dev] Getting ready for M1 :: Revised inter-component dependencies ("swimlanes")

by Alexey Kazakov

KB validation framework can/should be moved to common. See https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-6153 P.S. moved this thread to jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org ;) On 04/28/2011 09:56 AM, Viacheslav Kabanovich wrote: > There is now one required dependency of org.jboss.tools.esb.validator > on org.jboss.tools.jst.web.kb. > Validator for esb config xml is based on the validator framework > defined in web kb. If that framework can be moved to common module, > other dependencies are easy to remove. > > On 04/28/2011 09:19 AM, Alexey Kazakov wrote: >> On 04/28/2011 08:01 AM, Nick Boldt wrote: >>>>> - esb now depends on jst (not just on common) >>>> What ?! why ? >>> >>> Dunno, I just read the tea leaves (build log failures) and interpret >>> them. The leaves are subject to correct/non-correct interpretation & >>> reaction. :) >>> >> esb.core requires jst.web plug-in at least since 2008 (don't see >> earlier versions in svn). So I wouldn't say that it's something new. >> But the question is why it's so. >> >

13 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

3.3.0.M1 being attempted these days

by Max Rydahl Andersen

Hi, Nick is fighting vigorously to get a working build but seems many tests are simply taking way too long. Nick will do a few spins to see if continues and if it does we'll disable the tests for those "bad" builds to make a 3.3.0.M1 candidate that we can test and hopefully push as our first Indigo developer release. Please help out by trying extra hard no to break the code and help Nick if he calls out some build failure in your components. Thank you, /max http://about.me/maxandersen

13 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Fwd: [jboss-as7-dev] How to use AS 7 from Eclipse tools today

by Max Rydahl Andersen

> > Hi, > > It is not not the prettiest way to do it, but at least it works today ;) > > http://community.jboss.org/en/tools/blog/2011/04/18/how-to-use-jboss-as-7... > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen > >

13 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Be careful with release notes field in jira ...

by Max Rydahl Andersen

Hey Rob, Was it your intention to set release notes in https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8441 ? That field is used for automatically generation of release notes - my guess is you thought it was the comment field ? /max http://about.me/maxandersen

13 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Docbook editor where did you go ?

by Max Rydahl Andersen

Hey, What happend to our docbook editor ? There is a Docbook content type but it is not showing up in the editor rendered as it used too nor is there a designated editor as I thought there would be. It seems to be in trunk (looking at jsp/plugin.xml) but commented out in branch. Anyone remembers? /max http://about.me/maxandersen

13 years, 7 months

4
3
0 / 0

JBoss Tools 3.2.1/JBDS 4.1 Status Update

by Brian Fitzpatrick

Hi all... We're now almost all the way through the first week of April and I'd like to touch base about where we are regarding JBoss Tools 3.2.1 and JBDS 4.1. At last week's JBDS PM meeting, we discussed a few dates for JBDS 4.1 milestones... April for M1, May for CR1, and a June GA. These were pretty vague dates, so I'd like to lock this down to make these dates a bit more specific. Let's shoot for: * April 29, 2011, JBDS 4.1 M1 * May 20, 2011, JBDS 4.1 CR1 * June 17, 2011, JBDS 4.1 GA I'm hopeful that a three week window between M1 and CR1 will give QE the time they need to get things done. Unfortunately, the F2F meeting falls smack dab in the middle of that and we have JBoss World early in May. That may push these dates out a bit. However, hopefully we can take advantage of the growing suites of automated tests that Jiri and his team have been building over the year. We don't have a final date for SOA-P 5.2 yet, so we may have some additional wiggle room as well. That said, we still have a lot of open JIRAs. As of this moment, we have 89 JBIDE [1] and 11 JBDS [2] JIRAs open. With 15 working days between now and the end of April, I somehow doubt we're going to close all of these. I would encourage you to take a hard look at the JIRAs for your components set for 3.2.1 and figure out if they're critical for this short release cycle. If not, bounce them to 3.2.x or one of the 3.3 milestones. If they're still important, try and get them fixed. :) If we tighten the list of bugs and knock 'em off, we should be in better shape. Thanks in advance! Back to the bugs! --Fitz [1] Open JBoss Tools (JBIDE) JIRAs set for 3.2.1: http://goo.gl/rb6AQ [2] Open JBDS (JBDS) JIRAs set for 4.1: http://goo.gl/QNHrx _______________________________ Brian Fitzpatrick (aka "Fitz") Senior Software Engineer, SOA-P JBoss by Red Hat

13 years, 7 months

1
1
0 / 0

why aren't nonresolved EL names marked anymore?

by Max Rydahl Andersen

Hi, just noticed JBT 3.2 defaults to not warn against missing EL expressions. I thought we did that because of performance problems but are that still relevant today ? /max http://about.me/maxandersen

13 years, 7 months

2
2
0 / 0

GWT is still included in Hudson builds even though GWT is not available for Indigo

by Max Rydahl Andersen

Hi, I can't easily see where we need to remove gwt from the build setup. As an attempt to actually get the builds not complaining about missing GWT parts i've removed it (by commenting it out) from build/pom.xml and build/aggregate/site/site.xml Nick - if there are other places one need to look to exclude a component from the build it would be great to know ;) /max http://about.me/maxandersen

13 years, 7 months

2
2
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jbosstools-dev April 2011