On 13 Apr 2015, at 19:21, Rob Stryker wrote:
On 04/13/2015 06:45 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> I'm still not following/seeing why Teiid Designer needs runtime
> detection if it detects it at runtime ?
>
> /max
Download Runtime consists of 2 parts: 1 downloading + installing, and
2: making the server adapter (ie runtime detection).
Currently there are no server beans that can identify a DV / teiid
installation. So the runtime would only be recognized as an "EAP-Based
Product" by the code in ASTools, and it won't be given the most
optimal name... basically the same situation JPP was in before we
added custom server beans for them. It's a small issue in some ways,
but, it's better if all our APIs (including server bean loader)
ensure the most accurate results possible, and if it's possible for
them to identify a DV / Teiid Runtime installation, it's better to do
it than to not do it.
Ah, I forgot about the naming aspect. Sure this does make sense and
definitely something that is better of in Teiid IMO.
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen