Re: [jbosstools-dev] Moving to XulRunner 1.9

On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 08:27 -0400, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >>> I don't have the resources to promise that the javaxpcom will >> work/be >>> maintained so i guess for now we will just continue to bundle the >>> eclipse/mozilla custom built one so any security issues is not >> exposed >>> in the general browser but only in the development tooling >>> where it is less of an issue since it is primarily used to access >>> local sites. >>> >>> /max >> What does this mean for question move VPE on xulrunner 1.9 or not? >> /Maksim Areshkau > That beyo8nd xulrunner 1.9 removing features we depend on we now also > need someone to maintain the xpcom interfaces...afaik ATF did that before. Java XPCOM bridge provided by mozilla, what doing ATF gays - just provided a plugin with this interfaces, if so it's not difficult to do. > Who does it now ? > > /max Almost all xpcom interfaces that used by us has frozen status and shouldn't changed, so this doesn't needed to change something.

From today's N build (N200909010701), ATF is built against XULRunner 1.9