Re: [jbosstools-dev] Xulrunner downgraded for x64 in repository.jboss.org

Guys, What is the status for this 64-bit thing ? We need to move faster ,) Did you just randomly choose different compile options that made the distribution 2 meg different ? What is the known differences between .3 and .4 ? Should we just live with the small version difference ? I can't answer these since I don't know the details of xulrunner - you guys do. -max > Sergey said something about tests being included. > > Not sure > > Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > >> I was looking at these today and noticed there is about 2 meg difference between .3 and .4 - why ? >> >> /max >> >> >> >>> Hi all: >>> >>> I've up-loaded a down-graded version of xulrunner over at >>> http://repository.jboss.org/xulrunner/ >>> >>> The reason for this is so that we may (if it's not impossible) use a >>> matching xulrunner release across all jbds and jbosstools releases. >>> Previously, the x64 release was 1.8.1.4 rather than the standard 1.8.1.3 >>> used in windows, linux, and osx. >>> >>> Whether this can be worked into the build for 2.1.0 GA, or the update >>> site, or not, remains to be seen. But I just wanted to make sure this is >>> a possibility for GA. Personally, *I* hope it makes it in... but with >>> the xulrunner version being technically lower than the old, anyone >>> already using the product would have to manually downgrade the file in >>> the plugins folder. Not exactly a great situation. >>> >>> Parity? Or ease of use? Which will win? >>> >>> - Rob Stryker >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >