Re: [jbosstools-dev] Support of ADF components in VPE survey

Assuming we are really talking about Trinidad, not ADF (ADF is the non opensource varient). Coexist with Seam (very) well. Coexist with RichFaces ok (there is an integration package). Alex can comment better. No extra issues when you use Seam+RF+Trinidad. You can see the seamdiscs example for it in operation. On 21 Jan 2008, at 16:51, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:50:27 +0100, Pete Muir <pete.muir(a)jboss.org&gt; > wrote: > >> Technically good, visually appalling. > > any known issues/recommendations in context of Seam/richfaces ? Do > they coexist well/bad? > > /max > >> >> On 21 Jan 2008, at 16:40, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >> >>> Do we have any coverage of it today ? >>> >>> I've cc'ed Pete and Gavin to hear about their experience/feedback >>> on ADF. >>> >>> /max >>> >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> I would like to ask all of you about supporting ADF Faces Components >>>> (http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/adf/adffaces/ >>>> index.html) in >>>> our Visual Page Editor. Set of ADF components consists of over 100 >>>> components. Does the support of ADF components still relevant for us? >>>> >>>> Sergey >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ >> >> > > > > -- > Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/