September 2006 - jbosstools-dev - Jboss List Archives

by Ole Matzura

Thanks Rob, I'll check with Marshall on the status of this API.. regards! /Ole -----Original Message----- From: Rob Stryker [mailto:rob.stryker@jboss.com] Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2006 03:23 AM To: 'Ole Matzura' Cc: jbosside-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Subject: Re: [jbosside-dev] packaging API? Marshall has some packaging API underway... I dont even think wtp has any good packaging API available. On 9/23/06, Ole Matzura <ole(a)eviware.com> wrote:Hello all, maybe I missed this in some previous discussion, but I remember some talks about a "new" packaging API that would replace the "old" one.. has this happened? Will it happen? Or should packaging be done in some "WTP-dictated" way? thanks for any clarifications! regards, /Ole eviware.com _______________________________________________ jbosside-dev mailing list jbosside-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosside-dev

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jbosside-dev] JBossIDE nightly build 200609250038-nightly results

by jbosside-build＠jboss.org

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jbosside-dev] JBossIDE nightly build 200609232042-nightly results

by jbosside-build＠jboss.org

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

RE: [jbosside-dev] Call for tags...

by Koen Aers

For jbpm, best is to use the old tag (jbpm_gpd_3_0_11) unless the release of jbpm 3.2 alpha (with the the 3.0.12 gpd) is before JBossIDE 2.0.0.Beta2. In that case there will be a jbpm_gpd_3_0_12 available. Regards, Koen ________________________________ From: jbosside-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:jbosside-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Marshall Culpepper Sent: vrijdag 22 september 2006 4:23 To: Max Andersen Cc: Kris Verlaenen; jbosside-dev(a)lists.jboss.org; Michael Neale Subject: Re: [jbosside-dev] Call for tags... Yes of course integration builds are the first part of the process but we need tags for that =) On 9/21/06, Max Rydahl Andersen < max.andersen(a)jboss.com <mailto:max.andersen@jboss.com> > wrote: On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:16:30 +0200, Marshall Culpepper <marshall.culpepper(a)jboss.com> wrote: > Well the release build is supposed to be on Friday, but we can postpone > until Monday if needed (I'd rather not though) I assume you mean integration build ? Because we need testing (the amount of basic startup questions on the forum proved it again ;) I just completed my work and everything is in HEAD at the moment. I got caught up doing support with respect to http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2093 so would need to work on the documentation tomorrow for inclusion in the release. /max > > On 9/20/06, Max Rydahl Andersen <max.andersen(a)jboss.com> wrote: >> >> >> for when ? >> >> > Hey guys... >> > >> > I need CVS/Subversion tags for JBossIDE 2.0.0.Beta2 >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> -- >> Max Rydahl Andersen >> callto://max.rydahl.andersen >> >> Hibernate >> max(a)hibernate.org >> http://hibernate.org >> >> JBoss a division of Red Hat >> max.andersen(a)jboss.com >> > > > -- -- Max Rydahl Andersen callto://max.rydahl.andersen Hibernate max(a)hibernate.org http://hibernate.org JBoss a division of Red Hat max.andersen(a)jboss.com -- Marshall Culpepper marshall.culpepper(a)jboss.com JBossIDE Team Lead JBoss, a division of Red Hat

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jbosside-dev] JBossIDE nightly build 200609221932-nightly results

by jbosside-build＠jboss.org

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jbosside-dev] JBossIDE nightly build 200609220518-nightly results

by jbosside-build＠jboss.org

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jbosside-dev] JBossIDE nightly build 200609201836-nightly results

by jbosside-build＠jboss.org

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jbosside-dev] conclusion on the irc jbosside debug issue ?

by Max Rydahl Andersen

Hi guys, What were the conclusions/reasons for the debugging issues with our current AS adapter we talked shortly about on irc earlier today ? -- -- Max Rydahl Andersen callto://max.rydahl.andersen Hibernate max(a)hibernate.org http://hibernate.org JBoss a division of Red Hat max.andersen(a)jboss.com

17 years, 7 months

3
4
0 / 0

RE: [jbosside-dev] Re: jBPM Designer feature.xml needs to be updated

by Koen Aers

Great! I am in Paris for a jBPM training now but I will include this ASAP ________________________________ From: marshall.jboss(a)gmail.com [mailto:marshall.jboss@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Marshall Culpepper Sent: dinsdag 19 september 2006 18:12 To: Koen Aers Cc: Dev - JBoss IDE; jbosside-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Subject: Re: [jbosside-dev] Re: jBPM Designer feature.xml needs to be updated OK Koen.. I've uploaded a JAR to the repository under eclipse/releng/jbosside-releng-tasks.jar. This includes the CalculateFeatureDependenciesTask, and the antlib.xml is also included. On 9/14/06, Koen Aers <koen.aers(a)jboss.com> wrote: No I meant actually to CC jbosside-dev :-)) ________________________________ From: marshall.jboss(a)gmail.com [mailto:marshall.jboss@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Marshall Culpepper Sent: donderdag 14 september 2006 19:16 To: Dev - JBoss IDE Subject: Fwd: [jbosside-dev] Re: jBPM Designer feature.xml needs to be updated I think you meant to CC dev-jbosside on this one ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Koen Aers < koen.aers(a)jboss.com <mailto:koen.aers@jboss.com> > Date: Sep 14, 2006 6:59 AM Subject: RE: [jbosside-dev] Re: jBPM Designer feature.xml needs to be updated To: Marshall Culpepper <marshall.culpepper(a)jboss.com > I am pretty much OK with doing things the way they should be done, no problem with that. Btw, are you talking about the meeting when I was in India? I cannot remember discussing this, but this might be due to some kind of jetlag ;-). Anyway, we are in the process of releasing jBPM 3.2 alpha1 so the release has my number one attention at present. And as I mentioned earlier, the good way to reuse the tag that Marshall has written would be to bundle it in a library that resides in the repository to avoid duplication. Or am I wrong about this? Regards, Koen ________________________________ From: marshall.jboss(a)gmail.com [mailto: marshall.jboss(a)gmail.com <mailto:marshall.jboss@gmail.com> ] On Behalf Of Marshall Culpepper Sent: woensdag 13 september 2006 22:31 To: Max Andersen Cc: Koen Aers; jbosside-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Subject: Re: [jbosside-dev] Re: jBPM Designer feature.xml needs to be updated Yes, this is what we decided on our meeting.. we are moving all dependencies to be included the "right" way, and retrofitting the build system to calculate feature dependencies based on those entries, instead of counting on eclipse PDE to auto-bundle things that are listed as <plugin>. On 9/13/06, Max Rydahl Andersen <max.andersen(a)jboss.com> wrote: just to be clear: Our old/current way of bundling things are *wrong* in context of integrating with the rest of the eclipse ecosystem. you should only have <plugin> for plugins that is actually part of the plugin everything else is <import> of either plugin's or feature's. -- Marshall Culpepper marshall.culpepper(a)jboss.com JBossIDE Team Lead JBoss, a division of Red Hat -- Marshall Culpepper marshall.culpepper(a)jboss.com JBossIDE Team Lead JBoss, a division of Red Hat -- Marshall Culpepper marshall.culpepper(a)jboss.com JBossIDE Team Lead JBoss, a division of Red Hat

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

RE: [jbosside-dev] Re: jBPM Designer feature.xml needs to be updated

by Koen Aers

No I meant actually to CC jbosside-dev :-)) ________________________________ From: marshall.jboss(a)gmail.com [mailto:marshall.jboss@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Marshall Culpepper Sent: donderdag 14 september 2006 19:16 To: Dev - JBoss IDE Subject: Fwd: [jbosside-dev] Re: jBPM Designer feature.xml needs to be updated I think you meant to CC dev-jbosside on this one ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Koen Aers <koen.aers(a)jboss.com > Date: Sep 14, 2006 6:59 AM Subject: RE: [jbosside-dev] Re: jBPM Designer feature.xml needs to be updated To: Marshall Culpepper <marshall.culpepper(a)jboss.com > I am pretty much OK with doing things the way they should be done, no problem with that. Btw, are you talking about the meeting when I was in India? I cannot remember discussing this, but this might be due to some kind of jetlag ;-). Anyway, we are in the process of releasing jBPM 3.2 alpha1 so the release has my number one attention at present. And as I mentioned earlier, the good way to reuse the tag that Marshall has written would be to bundle it in a library that resides in the repository to avoid duplication. Or am I wrong about this? Regards, Koen ________________________________ From: marshall.jboss(a)gmail.com [mailto:marshall.jboss@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Marshall Culpepper Sent: woensdag 13 september 2006 22:31 To: Max Andersen Cc: Koen Aers; jbosside-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Subject: Re: [jbosside-dev] Re: jBPM Designer feature.xml needs to be updated Yes, this is what we decided on our meeting.. we are moving all dependencies to be included the "right" way, and retrofitting the build system to calculate feature dependencies based on those entries, instead of counting on eclipse PDE to auto-bundle things that are listed as <plugin>. On 9/13/06, Max Rydahl Andersen <max.andersen(a)jboss.com> wrote: just to be clear: Our old/current way of bundling things are *wrong* in context of integrating with the rest of the eclipse ecosystem. you should only have <plugin> for plugins that is actually part of the plugin everything else is <import> of either plugin's or feature's. -- Marshall Culpepper marshall.culpepper(a)jboss.com JBossIDE Team Lead JBoss, a division of Red Hat -- Marshall Culpepper marshall.culpepper(a)jboss.com JBossIDE Team Lead JBoss, a division of Red Hat

17 years, 7 months

2
1
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jbosstools-dev September 2006