Re: [jbosstools-dev] Git - do it fully or not ?

> +1 for git. > > Work with svn is very slow and disk-consuming and I have still issues 'svn > up', it still needs cleanup, or refuses to update. I started to hate svn, > please unschackle me :-) Btw. Nick and I had a chat the other day about what actually prevent us from moving and if it was just a question about git vs svn then we could easily move (assuming windows users are fine with using bash/cygwin) The challenge is that hudson+git is not as flexible as it currently is with svn and we don't yet have a good use of having our builds pick up latest/matching dependencies from a repository - thus not trivial to move away from git fully :( Will require a lot of effort. /max > > Libor > On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:54:34 +0100, Max Rydahl Andersen > <max.andersen(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> We got our svn mirror now but after working with it a bit its basically >> just as slow as normal svn (if you can get it to work). >> >> ...thus i'm wondering if anyone can come up with good reasons to *not* >> just move all new development over to git and simply kill off >> the SVN completely for our jbosstools trunk development ? >> >> 3.2.x would stay in SVN. >> >> Comments/Suggestions/Screams/Objections ? >> >> /max >> http://about.me/maxandersen >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev /max http://about.me/maxandersen _______________________________________________ jbosstools-dev mailing list jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev