Re: [jbosstools-dev] Xulrunner downgraded for x64 in repository.jboss.org

Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > I was looking at these today and noticed there is about 2 meg > difference between .3 and .4 - why ? > > /max >

> >> Hi all: >> >> I've up-loaded a down-graded version of xulrunner over at >> http://repository.jboss.org/xulrunner/ >> >> The reason for this is so that we may (if it's not impossible) use a >> matching xulrunner release across all jbds and jbosstools releases. >> Previously, the x64 release was 1.8.1.4 rather than the standard >> 1.8.1.3 >> used in windows, linux, and osx. >> >> Whether this can be worked into the build for 2.1.0 GA, or the update >> site, or not, remains to be seen. But I just wanted to make sure >> this is >> a possibility for GA. Personally, *I* hope it makes it in... but with >> the xulrunner version being technically lower than the old, anyone >> already using the product would have to manually downgrade the file in >> the plugins folder. Not exactly a great situation. >> >> Parity? Or ease of use? Which will win? >> >> - Rob Stryker >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > Which version of xulrunner did you compare? Where did you get it? /sergey _______________________________________________ jbosstools-dev mailing list jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev