+1 for git.
Work with svn is very slow and disk-consuming and I have still issues 'svn
up', it still needs cleanup, or refuses to update. I started to hate svn,
please unschackle me :-)
Libor
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:54:34 +0100, Max Rydahl Andersen
<max.andersen(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hey,
We got our svn mirror now but after working with it a bit its basically
just as slow as normal svn (if you can get it to work).
...thus i'm wondering if anyone can come up with good reasons to *not*
just move all new development over to git and simply kill off
the SVN completely for our jbosstools trunk development ?
3.2.x would stay in SVN.
Comments/Suggestions/Screams/Objections ?
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
_______________________________________________
jbosstools-dev mailing list
jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev