On 02/13/2013 08:39 PM, Nick Boldt wrote:
Mickael: I suppose we could have just two branches for Juno (4.2.0 +
4.2.x instead of three (4.2.0 + 4.2.1 + 4.2.2), since once we move to
4.2.2 we won't ever need to build the 4.2.1-based TPs again. WDYT?
Although
it's currently not the case, we used to work simultaneously on
4.2.0 and 4.2.1 branches. So IMO, 4.2.1 branch is not the continuation
of 4.2.1; and 4.2.2 is not the continuation of 4.2.2.
So I would be in favor of keeping one branch by "Target-Platform stream"
for consistency with past developments.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <
http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <
http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<
http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>