Re: [jbosstools-dev] Regarding launchbar contribution

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=467604 > Have wtp-dev suggested a name for it ? No, so far there are no comments on the bugzilla. I suggest you comment there if you so choose. > btw. does the launchbar work with local java apps and units too ? I probably need more of an explanation as to what you're asking, but, yes, it works for POJP and other launch configs as well. I've successfully seen MyMainClass in the list and run them.

But running a simple MyMainClass on some remote server doesn't work, if thats your question. Is that something you'd like to see?

On 05/20/2015 03:37 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > Rob, > > Have wtp-dev suggested a name for it ? > > btw. does the launchbar work with local java apps and units too ? > > I just realised we've been focusing purely on remote/server runs - > but > local runs should work too. > > /max > >> Since JBT 4.3.0.Final is slated for after Mars SR1, this seems >> reasonable. >> >> You don't technically need to have the same IU names to allow a >> seamless >> upgrade from o.j.t.whatever to o.eclipse.wtp.whatever. >> >> We've seen multiple instances where a JBoss project moved to >> Eclipse, >> and we were able to support the IU rename using a p2.inf >> instruction. >> >> Here's what we did to rename from com.jboss.jbds to >> com.jboss.devstudio: >> >> https://github.com/jbdevstudio/jbdevstudio-product/blob/jbosstools-4.2.x/... >> >> We've done similar with m2e-wtp, too. >> >> But of course it's simpler if we just build the plugin using the >> future >> o.e.wtp name, and a lower version. >> >> >> On 05/19/2015 04:58 PM, Rob Stryker wrote: >>> Hi All: >>> >>> wtp-dev mailing list seems to indicate its a bit too late to get >>> such a >>> contribution into Mars. They did suggest it might be reasonable for >>> SR1. >>> >>> With that in mind, we should discuss how to go about getting this >>> into >>> JBT for our Mars release, while still allowing it to be removed / >>> overridden by the eventual contribution to SR1. >>> >>> As of now, it seems the thing most important to discuss is naming >>> of the >>> plugin, to ensure that the name we use matches with the WTP one. >>> The >>> idea seems to be that if we release this plugin as 0.9.0 in JBT, >>> it can >>> be added to WTP for Mars SR1 with a higher version, thus replacing >>> ours. >>> >>> The issue at wtp can be discussed here: >>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=467604 >>> >>> >>> @Nick: Any ideas on whether this plan makes sense? >> >> -- >> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat >> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio >> http://nick.divbyzero.com >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen