Re: [jbosstools-dev] JBDS/Eclipse performance update
On 3 Jun 2015, at 16:07, Rastislav Wagner wrote:
Yes, i read the email. Sorry for not responding earlier-
no worry - I think something changed recently so my own emails aren't
listed when searching ;/
I thought that trying this would be faster - but I was fighting with
XML Catalog. Its a strange "beast".
it definitely is ;)
So I picked this file for testing [1] and added w3 schemes to catalog
and validation time went down from 5-6s to 1s.
[1]https://goo.gl/yrycT2
Thats significant!
And you don't see eclipse cache its prefetched items ? I was sure it did
cache that at some point.
So sounds like we got two bugs, one we can handle on our own ( but
should submit upstream ) and another that needs fix upstream most
likely.
1) find common used catalog/schemas from w3c we use in
examples/quickstarts etc. and add to our catalog, and submit patch to
wtp to add to theirs (might be an license issue here though we need to
check ;/
2) figure out why wtp xml is not caching prefetched images.
/max
Rastislav Wagner
JBDS QA
irc: rawagner
Red Hat Czech
Purkynova 99, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <manderse(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Mickael Istria" <mistria(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 1:36:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [jbosstools-dev] JBDS/Eclipse performance update
>
> Seems my mail got lost somewhere.
>
> Good findings, and yes I agree with Mickael it looks like it iis just
> about adding the most common files to the catalog but before we do so
> lets
> just add them manually and test if they make a difference.
>
> Can you try that Rastislav ?
>
> Thanks,
> Max
>
>> On 06/02/2015 04:51 PM, Rastislav Wagner wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> I noticed that WSDL validation is a bit slow when wsld file
>>> contains
>>> references to www.w3.org probably due to [1]. Bug for eclipse is
>>> already created and is a bit old [2]. I've commented there but no
>>> response yet.
>>> I dont know if any part of JBT/JBDS is doing something with w3.org,
>>> if yes, than you could consider doing something to minimize
>>> requests
>>> to w3.org servers.
>> It seems to be only a matter of providing the necessary catalog
>> extension (extension point is
>> org.eclipse.wst.xml.core.catalogContributions). Maybe you could
>> submit
>> a patch for that
>> But it's most likely too late to contribute that to Eclipse XML
>> support for Mars, so even with a patch upstream, we'd need to have a
>> local fix if we want it to behave better with JBT/JBDS. So it's
>> worth
>> opening a Jira and adding necessary DTD and XSD in JBT as well.
>> --
>> Mickael Istria
>> Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
>> My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
>> <http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>
>
> /max
> http://about.me/maxandersen
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen