Re: [jbosstools-dev] Xulrunner downgraded for x64 in repository.jboss.org

This should be up to the VPE team to decide. I would prefer one version used across the board. Why was 1.8.1.4 used instead of 1.8.1.3 ?

/max > Hi all: > > I've up-loaded a down-graded version of xulrunner over at > http://repository.jboss.org/xulrunner/ > > The reason for this is so that we may (if it's not impossible) use a > matching xulrunner release across all jbds and jbosstools releases. > Previously, the x64 release was 1.8.1.4 rather than the standard 1.8.1.3 > used in windows, linux, and osx. > > Whether this can be worked into the build for 2.1.0 GA, or the update > site, or not, remains to be seen. But I just wanted to make sure this is > a possibility for GA. Personally, *I* hope it makes it in... but with > the xulrunner version being technically lower than the old, anyone > already using the product would have to manually downgrade the file in > the plugins folder. Not exactly a great situation. > > Parity? Or ease of use? Which will win? > > - Rob Stryker > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > > _______________________________________________ jbosstools-dev mailing list jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev