Re: [jbosstools-dev] Aerogear name change proposal
On 19 Nov 2014, at 9:40, Petr Stribny wrote:
Max,
User-wise, the name Aerogear is mentioned only in links (on
tools.jboss.org) where all links link to "Hybrid Mobile Tools". You
won't find this "Aerogear" tooling nor "Aerogear" templates on
detail
page or in JBDS/JBoss Central. Everything is named "Hybrid Mobile
Tools" and "Hybrid Mobile project". So perhaps it would be enough just
to change text of these links. I believe that we should keep the name
consistent.
please point out specifically which links you believe are misleading.
even better submit PR to github.com/jbosstools-website
/max
--Petr
----- Original Message -----
From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <manderse(a)redhat.com>
To: "Gorkem Ercan" <gorkem.ercan(a)gmail.com>
Cc: "Petr Stribny" <pstribny(a)redhat.com>, "jbosstools-dev
jbosstools-dev" <jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Tuesday, 18 November, 2014 12:18:18 AM
Subject: Re: [jbosstools-dev] Aerogear name change proposal
> On 17 Nov 2014, at 18:04, Gorkem Ercan <gorkem.ercan(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen
>> <manderse(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 17 Nov 2014, at 13:08, Gorkem Ercan wrote:
>>
>>> The plan was to tool the bits coming in from aearogear. I think we
>>> are
>>> still doing that but that will be under FeeedHenry umbrella now.
>>> I am OK with changing the Aerogear to something like Mobile on the
>>> web site
>>> because it describes the product better. I guess we can
>>> add the FeedHenry things when they come under mobile at the web
>>> site.
>>>
>>> Aerogear is actually the name of the community project that builds
>>> software
>>> for mobile development. I do not think having the aerogear name on
>>> the jbosstool-aerogear repo, jira and the package names would hurt.
>>> So
>>> let's keep them as it is and only modify the website.
>>
>> if we call it mobile everywhere but don't have matching jira
>> component that would be a bad/confusing thing
>> I would like to have a proper separate name for it if possible that
>> can be used as component name too.
>>
>> Hybrid Mobile ?
>>
>> Aerogear Hybrid ?
>
>
> Problem solved, the current Jira component is already called
> aerogear-hybrid..
Okey. So nothing need to change ? Now I'm missing the reason for this
thread ? :)
Simple.
/max
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen