On 03/25/2013 08:42 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
What would be a good thing to get in source features ? couldn't
we do
this more intelligently with a resource copy trick replacing the
feature name properly ?
On our JBT site, Source features are available under a
"Sources"
category. IMO it's explicit enough and we can keep the default
"Developer Resources" name extension. People will understand.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <
http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <
http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<
http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>