9.1.0 is something we would want to release for Mars.2 (February/March
2016).
9.0.1 is something we could release earlier if we find critical issues
in 9.0.0.GA
But according to Max's statistic report users don't care much if we call
our builds Alphas/Betas/CRs or GA/Final. It means it doesn't make much
sense to release 9.0.1.Final close to 9.1.0.Beta.
So, my proposal would be:
1. Plan to release 9.1.0.Beta1 in Xmas and 9.1.0.GA around Eclipse
Mars.2 (February/March 2016)
2. If we find any critical issue in 9.0.0.GA we want to fix earlier we
could release 9.0.1 in November.
If it's OK I would move all current 9.0.1 issues to 9.1.0.Beta1. And
remove 9.0.1 not to confuse devs and QE. If we have any critical issues
and we see that we need release 9.0.1 then we will create this version
in JIRA.
WDYT?
On 10/14/2015 03:06 PM, Fred Bricon wrote:
Can we rename 9.0.1.Beta1 to 9.1.0.Beta1 in JIRA, if need be?
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Alexey Kazakov <alkazako(a)redhat.com
<mailto:alkazako@redhat.com>> wrote:
4.3.1.Beta1 yes.
9.0.1.Beta1 probably yes too, but not sure we will release 9.0.1.
It's possible that we will release 9.1.0 Only. Anyway 9.1.0 will
use 4.3.x branch so, we can have both 9.0.1.Beta1 and 9.1.0.Beta1
and if we don't release 9.0.1 we will move all 9.0.1 issues to 9.1.0.
On 10/14/2015 02:22 PM, Denis Golovin wrote:
> Should we create specific development versions for 4.3.x/9.0.x
> streams in JIRA?
> Something like:
> - 4.3.1.Beta1
> - 9.0.1.Beta1
>
> Then we can use it in fixed issues.
>
> Currently I see only 4.3.1.Final and 9.0.1.GA <
http://9.0.1.GA>
> are available.
>
> Denis
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Alexey Kazakov
> <alkazako(a)redhat.com <mailto:alkazako@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please make sure when you are fixing anything in both 4.3.x
> and master
> branches, create a separate issue for every stream. So we
> will have two
> JIRAs (the original one + a clone), one for 4.4.0 and the
> second one for
> 4.3.0.
> It will help QE to verify the issue is fixed in both streams.
> Remember
> we have different cycles for maintenance and main releases.
> It's OK to have multiple fix versions in one JIRA while you
> are working
> on it. It's NOT OK to resolve an issue with the only fix
> version and w/o
> a clone while applying a PR to both streams!
>
> Thanks.
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:jbosstools-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>
> --
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and files attached to it are
> confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you are
> hereby notified
> that using, copying, distributing or taking any action in
> reliance on the
> contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received
> this email in error please notify the sender and delete this
> email.
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and files attached to it are
> confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you are
> hereby notified that using, copying, distributing or taking any
> action in reliance on the contents of this information is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error
> please notify the sender and delete this email.
>
_______________________________________________
jbosstools-dev mailing list
jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:jbosstools-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev