Re: [jbosstools-dev] Git - do it fully or not ?

This means you can - *in theory* - build the parent pom (and target platform) [3] or grab it from Nexus [4] (if we decide to keep deploying stuff there?), check out a component's sources from github, and build that component against upstream eclipse deps + upstream previously-built JBT components.

In other words... I think moving to github, one component at a time, MAY BE VIABLE, but there's still a lot of testing left to do to validate this theory. [1] http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/indigo/ [2] http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/builds/staging/_composite_/3.3.indigo/ [3] http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbosstools/branches/3.3.indigo/build/ [4] http://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/groups/public/org/jboss/tools/ N On 03/07/2011 10:39 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > >> +1 for git. >> >> Work with svn is very slow and disk-consuming and I have still issues 'svn >> up', it still needs cleanup, or refuses to update. I started to hate svn, >> please unschackle me :-) > > Btw. Nick and I had a chat the other day about what actually prevent us from moving and > if it was just a question about git vs svn then we could easily move (assuming windows users > are fine with using bash/cygwin) > > The challenge is that hudson+git is not as flexible as it currently is with svn and we don't yet > have a good use of having our builds pick up latest/matching dependencies from a repository - > thus not trivial to move away from git fully :( > > Will require a lot of effort. > > /max > > >> >> Libor >> On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:54:34 +0100, Max Rydahl Andersen >> <max.andersen(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> Hey, >>> >>> We got our svn mirror now but after working with it a bit its basically >>> just as slow as normal svn (if you can get it to work). >>> >>> ...thus i'm wondering if anyone can come up with good reasons to *not* >>> just move all new development over to git and simply kill off >>> the SVN completely for our jbosstools trunk development ? >>> >>> 3.2.x would stay in SVN. >>> >>> Comments/Suggestions/Screams/Objections ? >>> >>> /max >>> http://about.me/maxandersen >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen > > > > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev -- Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio Release Engineer :: Eclipse Modeling & Dash Athena http://nick.divbyzero.com _______________________________________________ jbosstools-dev mailing list jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev