Re: [jbosstools-dev] Eclipse Juno testing

16.04.2012 15:21, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >> What are the plans to make commits for Eclipse Juno possible? Are we going to have a branch for it or will migrate trunk soon? > We are looking to try and be compatible. > >> I had a lot of changes as usual in JPT plugins. > Again !? Aren't we able to avoid these ? Yes, they consolidated of the java resource model for JAXB and JPA.

> > Please for now, simply open jiras with problems found and create subtasks/links to https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11549 > > Thank you, > Max > > p.s. I removed all the non-relevant mailing lists and just left jbosstools-dev for these specifics. > >> Dmitry >> >> 14.04.2012 18:51, Nick Boldt wrote: >>> (2012-04-13 13:32:29) ldimaggi_: nboldt, bfitzpat stupid question - Juno >>> is 4.2 - what's 3.8? >>> (2012-04-13 13:32:43) bfitzpat: also Juno >>> (2012-04-13 13:33:02) bfitzpat: 3.8 and 4.2 are both Juno, but 4.2 is >>> the main version and 3.8 is the 3.x stream version >>> (2012-04-13 13:34:10) bfitzpat: 3.x is on its way out eventually >>> (2012-04-13 13:34:44) ldimaggi_: bfitzpat, got it - so - we need to >>> test.............both - and 3.7 to I think ;-) >>> 13:35 >>> (2012-04-13 13:35:16) bfitzpat: yeah, well... we don't really have a 4.2 >>> ready build yet so far as I know >>> (2012-04-13 13:35:26) bfitzpat: though Nick is pushing to test some >>> early stuff >>> (2012-04-13 13:36:23) ldimaggi_: bfitzpat, that's why I asked ;-) >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Since 4.2 is already at M6 [1], the window of opportunity to discover >>> what (if anything) in JBDS won't run on it is nearly closed. After M7 >>> (Star Wars Day*) only hold-the-presses, stop-ship issues will be >>> CONSIDERED, much less fixed. >>> >>> Sure, we can report issues against upstream later on and they'll get >>> fixed (maybe) in SR1 (September 2012) or SR2 (February 2013) but >>> ideally, JBDS 5 would run OOTB on Eclipse 4.2/3.8 as well as 3.7, >>> without our needing to patch stuff in Eclipse or WTP (like we have had >>> to do in past years, particularly re: SWT or equinox). Ideally, we'd be >>> able to have the same JBDS 5 bits working on BOTH Eclipse 3.7.2 and 4.2/3.8. >>> >>> So, to that end, we need to start testing builds [2] and installs of >>> JBDS 5 on the new Juno platform as well as the existing Indigo one. >>> >>> [1] >>> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Juno/Simultaneous_Release_Plan#Milestones_and_Rel... >>> >>> [2] >>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11469?focusedCommentId=12684016#com... >>> >>> -- >>> >>> As to the question of 3.8 vs. 4.2, 3.x is the old stream which is being >>> (eventually) phased out. 4.2 includes a compatibility layer so that in >>> theory anything 3.x-dependent can run on 4.2 as well. The TP I built >>> includes the 4.2 bits (which in turn include much of the 3.8 site too). >>> My fond hope is that I won't need to include any additional 3.8-level >>> plugins beyond what's already in the Juno or Eclipse 4.2 sites. >>> >>> -- >>> >>> More info& links: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11469 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ jbosstools-dev mailing list jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev