You might consider pulling in the freemarker dependency from jbt (there is a freemarker feature/plugin). You might consider the same for any commons-* dependencies, wsdl4j, etc.

----- Original Message ----- > Yes. All of those are needed. Alessio promises that we may be able to pare > down a few over time, but because of what WISE requires and what AS > includes, we wanted to make sure we got it all in there. > > Sorry, but for now we need to keep 'em. > > _______________________________ > Brian Fitzpatrick (aka "Fitz") > Senior Software Engineer, SOA-P > JBoss by Red Hat > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <manderse(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: "jbosstools-dev jbosstools-dev" <jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > Cc: "Brian Fitzpatrick" <bfitzpat(a)redhat.com&gt; > Sent: Monday, May 6, 2013 3:49:34 AM > Subject: smooks, freemarker AND velocity needed for WSDL generation ? > > Hey Brian, > > I spotted https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-webservices/pull/32 and > noticed > this drags in *alot* of jars. I knew WISe would drag in a good chunk but > didn't expect > to drag in things like smooks, both velocity AND freemarker... > > are all those really needed ? > > Note: as far as I can see none of all these external jars are exported in the > manifest.mf > so at runtime and build time it is all internal (great! :) - but i'm just > wondering if we > really need to carry those extra MB's around for no good reason. > > /max > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > _______________________________________________ jbosstools-dev mailing list jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev

It seems to me that bundle "org.eclipse.wst.wsdl" provides a facade for wsdl4j or some similar feature. Could this be used instead of a nested jar? -- Mickael Istria Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat My blog - My Tweets

_______________________________________________ jbosstools-dev mailing list jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev

Ok. I'll look into using more existing bundles to cut down the number of jars. Thanks for the feedback guys! _______________________________ Brian Fitzpatrick (aka "Fitz") Senior Software Engineer, SOA-P JBoss by Red Hat ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Cernich" <rcernich(a)redhat.com&gt; To: "Mickael Istria" <mistria(a)redhat.com&gt; Cc: jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Sent: Monday, May 6, 2013 11:47:00 AM Subject: Re: [jbosstools-dev] smooks, freemarker AND velocity needed for WSDL generation ? Actually, the platform does provide bundles for commons functionality (e.g. lang and collections) and wsdl4j (javax.wsdl). It seems to me that bundle "org.eclipse.wst.wsdl" provides a facade for wsdl4j or some similar feature. Could this be used instead of a nested jar? -- Mickael Istria Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat My blog - My Tweets _______________________________________________ jbosstools-dev mailing list jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev _______________________________________________ jbosstools-dev mailing list jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev _______________________________________________ jbosstools-dev mailing list jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev