From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <manderse(a)redhat.com&gt; To: "Rob Cernich" <rcernich(a)redhat.com&gt; Cc: "jbosstools-dev jbosstools-dev" <jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt;, "soa-tools-list" <soa-tools-list(a)redhat.com&gt; Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 3:26:29 AM Subject: Re: [Soa-tools-list] JBTIS 4.1.1 Available on Integration got a link ? I'll assume its http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/integration/kepler/integrati... The locus site really should not be referenced by any site - the specific bundles needed should be put into the repository we are creating. Locus is like Orbit - it is a p2 repository from which you get dependencies to include into an actual release, not for linkage. In other words, the only place locus should show up is in the .target file used to build the target platform site for. /max On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:32:55PM -0400, Rob Cernich wrote: >Hey all, > >There's a new JBTIS 4.1 build on the integration site. This build includes >fixes to address the Locus site reference and updates to SwitchYard and >Savara. Please review the contents so we can promote to development by >week's end. > >Thanks, >Rob > >_______________________________________________ >Soa-tools-list mailing list &gt;Soa-tools-list(a)redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/soa-tools-list _______________________________________________ Soa-tools-list mailing list Soa-tools-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/soa-tools-list

> got a link ? > I'll assume its > http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/integration/kepler/integrati... > > The locus site really should not be referenced by any site - the specific > bundles needed should be put into the > repository we are creating. > > Locus is like Orbit - it is a p2 repository from which you get dependencies > to include into an actual release, not > for linkage. > > In other words, the only place locus should show up is in the .target file > used to build the target platform site for. That sounds good, but currently, the community builds include repository references to pick up all dependencies (mostly from "requirements"), while the JBDS version uses the target platform site. That said, should we begin creating a "extras" site to include the Locus plugins? Or should we just include those artifacts in the JBTIS site itself?

> > /max > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:32:55PM -0400, Rob Cernich wrote: > >Hey all, > > > >There's a new JBTIS 4.1 build on the integration site. This build includes > >fixes to address the Locus site reference and updates to SwitchYard and > >Savara. Please review the contents so we can promote to development by > >week's end. > > > >Thanks, > >Rob > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Soa-tools-list mailing list > &gt;Soa-tools-list(a)redhat.com > >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/soa-tools-list > _______________________________________________ Soa-tools-list mailing list Soa-tools-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/soa-tools-list