OK Koen.. I've uploaded a JAR to the repository under
eclipse/releng/jbosside-releng-tasks.jar. This includes the
CalculateFeatureDependenciesTask, and the antlib.xml is also included.
On 9/14/06, Koen Aers <koen.aers(a)jboss.com> wrote:
No I meant actually to CC jbosside-dev :-))
------------------------------
*From:* marshall.jboss(a)gmail.com [mailto:marshall.jboss@gmail.com] *On
Behalf Of *Marshall Culpepper
*Sent:* donderdag 14 september 2006 19:16
*To:* Dev - JBoss IDE
*Subject:* Fwd: [jbosside-dev] Re: jBPM Designer feature.xml needs to be
updated
I think you meant to CC dev-jbosside on this one
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Koen Aers <koen.aers(a)jboss.com >
Date: Sep 14, 2006 6:59 AM
Subject: RE: [jbosside-dev] Re: jBPM Designer feature.xml needs to be
updated
To: Marshall Culpepper <marshall.culpepper(a)jboss.com >
I am pretty much OK with doing things the way they should be done, no
problem with that.
Btw, are you talking about the meeting when I was in India? I cannot
remember discussing this, but this might be due to some kind of jetlag ;-).
Anyway, we are in the process of releasing jBPM 3.2 alpha1 so the release
has my number one attention at present. And as I mentioned earlier, the good
way to reuse the tag that Marshall has written would be to bundle it in a
library that resides in the repository to avoid duplication. Or am I wrong
about this?
Regards,
Koen
------------------------------
*From:* marshall.jboss(a)gmail.com [mailto:marshall.jboss@gmail.com] *On
Behalf Of *Marshall Culpepper
*Sent:* woensdag 13 september 2006 22:31
*To:* Max Andersen
*Cc:* Koen Aers; jbosside-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
*Subject:* Re: [jbosside-dev] Re: jBPM Designer feature.xml needs to be
updated
Yes, this is what we decided on our meeting.. we are moving all
dependencies to be included the "right" way, and retrofitting the build
system to calculate feature dependencies based on those entries, instead of
counting on eclipse PDE to auto-bundle things that are listed as <plugin>.
On 9/13/06, Max Rydahl Andersen <max.andersen(a)jboss.com> wrote:
> just to be clear:
>
> Our old/current way of bundling things are *wrong* in context of
> integrating with the rest of
> the eclipse ecosystem. you should only have <plugin> for plugins that is
> actually part of the plugin
> everything else is <import> of either plugin's or feature's.
>
>
>
--
Marshall Culpepper
marshall.culpepper(a)jboss.com
JBossIDE Team Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
--
Marshall Culpepper
marshall.culpepper(a)jboss.com
JBossIDE Team Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
--
Marshall Culpepper
marshall.culpepper(a)jboss.com
JBossIDE Team Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat