On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:18:05 +0100, Rob Stryker <rob.stryker(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Legacy was intended to be things that were deprecated and no longer
under active development, and would eventually be removed. Both modules
should be the same as each other right now but I will double check. If
they are both the same and there are no differences, I'll remove one
ASAP. If there are differences, I'll try to discover which one is the
right one and remove the other.
thanks.
Why not just delete the legacy modules from trunk/svn ?
/max
- Rob
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 02:57:02 +0100, Denis Golovin <dgolovin(a)exadel.com> wrote:
>
>
>> What is legacy component intended for?
>>
>
> Something rob/marshall created a while back - I thought it was only temporary while
cleaning up but seems to have stuck around.
>
> I think it needs to be removed but need to hear from Rob/Marshall the status.
>
> /max
>
>
>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was trying to setup a clean tools environment today and stumbled on that we
have duplicate .project's in trunk. Why is that ?
>>>
>>> example org.jboss.ide.eclipse.jdt.test.core exists both in legacy and in
core..which one is the relevant one ?
>>>
>>> Alot of the others in legacy also seem duplicated...why.
>>>
>>> This prevents me (and other users) to simply to do an import of trunk in
eclipse in more or less a single click.
>>>
>>> -max
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client:
http://www.opera.com/mail/