Re: [jbossws-dev] JBossWS testsuite reorganization

On 17/12/14 11:17, Alessio Soldano wrote: > On 17/12/14 10:54, Jim Ma wrote: >> What I want to propose is to simplify our build more. wildfly900 or >> wildfly810 profile is required to run test suite, and we can take one >> as the default setting. My goal is to use one simple "mvn clean >> install" to build jbossws-cxf, deploy to wildfly and run the tests. If >> wildfly900 is not a good option here, I am not against take wildfly810 >> profile as the default test container. Your thoughts ? > I see your point. I can have a look at enabling by default the most > recent released target container (wfly 810 currently). I've had a look and it's not easily doable, basically because there's no way in Maven (AFAIK) to have a profile enabled unless another one (in a set of 2 or 3) is already enabled. The only solution is to have the wildfly800,wildfly810,wildfly900 profiles be controlled by the value of a command line property (something like -DintegrationTarget=wildfly810). In the main pom.xml, we'd need an additional profile for the default scenario, to be enabled when the property is not provided. We'd have to duplicate the whole wildfly810 profile in modules/testsuite/pom.xml too, which is quite a big one (additional dependencies, additional plugins, etc in it), making the pom even harder to read. I'm starting thinking this creates more problems then it actually

solves. An alternative approach could be to have a profile using a antrun plugin to check if there's one of the wildfly800,wildfly810,wildfly900 profiles enabled (e.g. by checking the jboss.version property that's set by those profiles) and make the build fail with a nice message explaining what to do (either use one of those profiles, or set a property for preventing the check). WDYT?

Cheers Alessio -- Alessio Soldano Web Service Lead, JBoss _______________________________________________ jbossws-dev mailing list jbossws-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossws-dev