July 2009 - jbpm-dev - Jboss List Archives

Hudson build completed: jbpm4-base » java16_default,linux #441

by jboss-qa-internal＠redhat.com

See http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbpm4-base/./jdk=java16_default,lab...

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - 'default' field on transition in pvm

by kukeltje

Would be very interesting to have this: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2465 View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4247099#4247099 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4247099

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

Which 'fixversion' do I choose for bpmn related issues?

by Ronald van Kuijk

4.x? Seems to be the safest for now. If everybody at least labels issues that are related to this with bpmn, we can bulk change issues later. And if people file features, it might be best to keep the basic/core/extended grouping in mind. A nice mindmap view of this is in http://www.slideshare.net/jimarlow/introductiontobpmn005 Ronald

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

Hudson build completed: jbpm4-base » java16_default,linux #440

by jboss-qa-internal＠redhat.com

See http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbpm4-base/./jdk=java16_default,lab...

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: .classpath and .project to .svnignore

by kukeltje

- They are eclipse specific - If something changes in the pom.xml you have to regenerate them anyhow - They can contain absolute paths (OS specific things) - My sync with repository always shows them. *outgoing* Personally, I do not need them from svn. I'll regenerate with M2/mvn if needed. The pom is leading anyway. But if others think they are handy, I'll live with them View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4247057#4247057 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4247057

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: .classpath and .project to .svnignore

by camunda

Tortoise can set them to ignore easily. But do we ant to delete them? The other modules have them checked in as well... View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4247036#4247036 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4247036

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: .classpath and .project to .svnignore

by kukeltje

Deleting them is one. But in addition to that, adding them to cvs ignore (assuming you all work with M2? /mvn eclipse:eclipse to regenerate .project and .classpath files If you can do that also, recursively... be my guest. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4247021#4247021 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4247021

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: .classpath and .project to .svnignore

by camunda

Seems like all of them are checked in. Not sure if that is an accident or desired? I could delete them via TortoiseSVN directly... Eclipse is a pain in this area ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246992#4246992 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4246992

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: refactoring org.jbpm.bpmn to org.jbpm.bpmn.internal?

by kukeltje

I'm in doubt. I can add a field to BpmnActivity and set that when parsing so the behaviour of forking or not is controlled by that. The other option is to do it in the activity by passing e.g. a boolean parameter to 'leaveBpmnActivity' or have two methods 'leaveForked' and 'leaveSingle' or something. I'll imlpement the one with the boolean parameterd first since that is already in place. Can always be refactored. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246974#4246974 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4246974

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: refactoring org.jbpm.bpmn to org.jbpm.bpmn.internal?

by kukeltje

I'm in doubt. I can add a field to BpmnActivity and set that when parsing so the behaviour of forking or not is controlled by that. The other option is to do it in the activity by passing e.g. a boolean parameter to 'leaveBpmnActivity'. I'll do the latter first since that is already in place. Can always be refactored. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246973#4246973 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4246973

15 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

jbpm-dev July 2009